A Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nitrogen Intensity, Gross Margin, and Land Use Occupation between Comparable Conventional and Organic Managed Dairy Farms

Authors

• Kristian Hansen Aarhus University, Denmark; Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, Norway
• Matthias Koesling Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway
• Håvard Steinshamn Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway
• Bjørn Gunnar Hansen Tine SA Research and Development Department, Norway
• Tommy Dalgaard Aarhus University, Denmark
• Sissel Hansen Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-3576

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.137608

Keywords:

propensity matching, life cycle assessment, norwegian dairy farms

Abstract

In this study, 200 Norwegian dairy farms were analyzed over three years to compare greenhouse gas emissions, nitrogen (N) intensity, gross margin, and land use occupation between organically and conventionally managed farms. Conventionally managed farm groups were constructed based on propensity matching, selecting the closest counterparts to organically managed farms (n=15). These groups, each containing 15 farms, were differentiated by an increasing number of matching variables. The first group was matched based on geographical location, milk quota, and milking cow units. In the second match, the proportion of milking cows in the total cattle herd was added, and in the third, the ratio of milk delivered to milk produced and concentrate usage per dairy cow were included. The analysis showed that the conventionally managed farms (n=185) had higher greenhouse gas emissions (1.42 vs 0.98 kg CO₂ per 2.78 MJ of edible energy from milk and meat, calculated as GWP_100-AR4) and higher N intensity (6.9 vs 5.0 kg N input per kg N output) compared to the organic farms (N=15). When comparing emissions per kg of energy-corrected milk (ECM) delivered, conventional farms also emitted more CO₂ (1.07 vs 0.8 kg CO₂ per kg ECM). Furthermore, conventionally managed farms showed lower gross margins both in terms of NOK per 2.78 MJ edible energy delivered (5.8 vs 6.5 NOK) and per milking cow unit (30 100 vs 34 400 NOK), and they used less land (2.9 vs 3.6 m² per 2.78 MJ edible energy delivered) compared to organic farms. No differences were observed among the three conventionally managed groups in terms of emissions, N intensity, land use occupation, and gross margin.