Ten years of photogrammetry and LiDAR

Digital 3D documentation in Finnish archaeology between 2013–2022

Authors

• Nikolai Paukkonen University of Helsinki, Muuritutkimus Oy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61258/fa.142220

Keywords:

fieldwork methods, digital archaeology, LiDAR, laser scanning, photogrammetry, digital humanities, Finnish archaeology

Abstract

The realities of archaeological fieldwork have been revolutionized by new digital documentation methods. Among these are various new ways to produce photorealistic and/or accurate 3D measurements, namely photogrammetry and laser scanning. They have become well known technologies but the actual frequency of their use in day-today fieldwork has not been studied before. The ‘Quality instructions on archaeological fieldwork' (Arkeologisten kenttätöiden laatuohjeet) document, published by the Finnish Heritage Agency in 2013, states that all archaeological reports have to mention the technologies and methods used. Using a collection of some 3600 digitized reports from between 2013 and 2022 I show how widespread the use of these novel methods has actually been during the decade in Finland, and what are the implications of their use. What kind of actors are the most prevalent users? Have the methods been widely adopted, or are some more traditional methods still more popular?

References

Anttiroiko, N., Groesz, F., Ikäheimo, J., Kelloniemi, A., Nurmi, R., Rostad, S. & Seitsonen O.

Detecting the Archaeological Traces of Tar Production Kilns in the Northern Boreal

Forests Based on Airborne Laser Scanning and Deep Learning. Remote Sensing 15(7): 1799.

https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071799

Börjesson, L., Sköld, O., Friberg, Z., Löwenborg, D., Pálsson, G. & Huvila, I. 2022. Re-purposing

Excavation Database Content as Paradata: An Explorative Analysis of Paradata Identification

Challenges and Opportunities. KULA 6(3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.221

Collis, J. 2013. The Development of Archaeological Thought as Evidenced in the

Yorkshire Archaeological Journal. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 85(1): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1179/0084427613Z.00000000018

Dallas, C. 2015. Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the Digital Continuum: from

Practice to Infrastructure. Open Archaeology 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0011

Debenjak, A. 2015. 3D-mallintaminen osana arkeologista arkea? Digitaalisen

fotogrammetrian käyttö arkeologisessa dokumentoinnissa ja tutkimuksessa.

Muinaistutkija 1/2015: 24–34.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2015. Museoviraston tilinpäätös. Helsinki: Finnish Heritage

Agency.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2016. Suomen arkeologisten kenttätöiden laatuohjeet.

Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki. https://web.archive.org/web/20190214163030/www.

museovirasto.fi/uploads/Meista/Julkaisut/laatuohje-2016. pdf Read 21 November 2023.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2017. Museoviraston tilinpäätös. Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2020a. Suomen arkeologisten kenttätöiden laatuohjeet.

Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki. https://stmuseovirastoprod.blob.core.windows.

net/museovirasto/Kulttuuriymparisto/arkeologisten_kenttatoiden_laatuohje_2020.pdf

Read 21 November 2023.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2020b. Museoviraston tilinpäätös. Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Finnish Heritage Agency. 2023. Arkeologia 2.0. Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

https://www.museovirasto.fi/fi/kulttuuriymparisto/arkeologinen-kulttuuriperinto/arkeologia-2-0 Read 21 November 2023.

Frösén, J., Zbigienew, F., Koistinen, K., Lavento, M., Holmgren, R., Gerber, Y., Mikkola, E., Ylönen-Peltonen, R., Heiska, N. & Lahelma, A. 2001. The 2000 Finnish

Hārūn Project: Preliminary Report. Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan

: 359–376.

Haggrén, H., Koistinen, K., Junnilainen, H. & Erving, A. 2005. Photogrammetric

Documentation and Modelling of an Archaelogical Site: The Finnish Jabal

Haroun Project. In S. El-Hakim, F. Remondino, L. Gonzo (eds.) Proceedings

of the ISPRS Working Group V/4 Workshop 3D-ARCH 2005: Virtual Reconstruction

and Visualization of Complex Architectures. XXXVI, part 5/W17.

Haggrén, H. 2007. TKK:n rooli kansallisen kulttuuriperinnön dokumentoinnissa.

Museoviraston dokumentointiseminaari, Hämeenlinna 22–23.11.2007.

Haggrén, G., Knuutinen, T., Holappa, M. & Terävä, E. 2014. RAASEPORI Raaseporin

linna. Koekaivauskertomus 2014. Excavation report, Länsi-Uudenmaan maakuntamuseo.

Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Hakonen, A., Kuusela, J. & Okkonen, J. 2015. Assessing the application of laser

scanning and 3D inspection in the study of prehistoric cairn sites: The case study of

Tahkokangas, Northern Finland. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2: 227–334.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.02.001

Heiska, N. 2008a. Laserkeilaus mittaus- ja mallinnusmenetelminä. Muinaistutkija

/2008. 34–45.

Heiska, N. 2008b. Marcus Lucretiuksen talon mittausdokumentointi. P. Castrén (ed.) Domus

Pompeiana – Talo Pompejissa: 175–180 Helsinki: Otava.

Heiska, N. 2009. Aboa Vetuksen raunioiden laserkeilaus. Mittaustekniikan uudet

mahdollisuudet kulttuuriperinnön dokumentoinnissa. In T. Muhonen & J. LehtoVahtera (eds.) Ikuinen raunio. Turku, 12.–13.2.2008: 86–94. Aboa Vetus Ars Nova.

Huvila, I. 2014. Archaeologists and their Information Sources. In I. Huvila (ed.)

Perspectives to Archaeological Information in the Digital Society: 25–54. Uppsala:

Department of ALM, Uppsala University.

Huvila, I., Sköld, O. & Börjesson, L. 2021. Documenting information making in

archaeological field reports. Journal of Documentation 77(5): 1107–1127. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2020-0188

Huvila, I., Börjesson, L. & Sköld, O. 2022. Archaeological information-making activities

according to field reports. Library & Information Science Research 44(3): 101171.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101171

Junnilainen, H., Koistinen, K., Latikka, J., Haggrén, H., Erving, A., Heiska, N. &

Zbigniew, F. 2008. The Cartographic Documentation in the FJHP Excavations.

In F. Zbigniew, J. Frösen (eds.) Petra – The Mountain of Aaron Vol I, The Church

and the Chapel: 61–87. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarium Fennica.

Koistinen, K. 2000. 3D Documentation for Archaeology during Finnish Jabal

Harûn Project. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: 33,

Part B5: 440–445.

Koivisto, S. & Laulumaa V. 2013. Pistepilvessä – Metsien arkeologiset kohteet LiDAR ilmalaserkeilausaineistoissa. Arkeologipäivät 2012:51–67 Helsinki: The Archaeological

Society of Finland.

Kuusela, J. 2022a. POSIO 1000045812 Teuronjoki. Kehävallikohteen tarkastus. Inspection report. Lapin maakuntamuseo. Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Kuusela, J. 2022b. KEMIJÄRVI ja SALLA Suomutunturijärjestelmä. Pyyntikuoppakohteiden inventointi. Inspection report. Lapin maakuntamuseo, Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Laulumaa, V. 2015. Virolahti Lakiasuo. Teräsbetonisen majoituskorsun nro 67 dokumentointi ja ympäristön linnoitteiden kartoitus. Documentation report, FHA Field Services, Finnish Heritage Agency, Helsinki.

Lehto, H. & Uotila, K. 2017. Laserkeilaus dokumentointitapana hautakaivauksilla –

Esimerkki Rauman rauniokirkolta vuodelta 2016. Muinaistutkija 3/2017: 9–18.

Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., & Braun, D. 2020. The Digital Revolution

to Come: Photogrammetry in Archaeological Practice. American Antiquity 85(4): 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59

Marila, M. & Ilves, K. 2021. Maritime Archaeology in Finland: History and Future Tasks. Journal of Maritime Archaeology 16: 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-021-09303-2

Marín-Buzón C, Pérez-Romero A, LópezCastro JL, Ben Jerbania, I. & ManzanoAgugliaro, F. 2021. Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends. Sustainability 13(9): 5319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095319

Paukkonen, N. 2023. Towards a Mobile 3D Documentation Solution. Video-Based Photogrammetry and iPhone 12 Pro as Fieldwork Documentation Tools. Journal of

Computer Applications in Archaeology 6(1): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.135