Measures of Strategy Flexibility in an Abbreviated Tri-phase Test on Linear and Quadratic Equation Solving

Authors

• Anne-Maria Ernvall-Hytönen
• Peter Hästö
• Sara Parikka
• Heidi Krzywacki

Abstract

This methodological paper is concerned with the issue of measuring strategy flexibility. We devised a 6-item tri-phase test from the domains of linear and quadratic equations. The test was completed by 306 students in an introductory university mathematics course. To validate the test we consider alternative definitions of key variables and conduct psychometric analyses of our strategy flexibility measures' internal consistency and factorial validity. We show that various choices for the definition of variables have no significant impact and that the test is internally consistent despite the inclusion of both linear and quadratic equations.

References

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Asso-ciation, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for ed-ucational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Babu, G.J. (1992). Subsample and half-sample methods. Annals of the Institute of Sta-tistical Mathematics, 44, 703-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053399

Ernvall-Hytönen, A.-M., Hästö, P., Krzywacki, H., & Parikka, S. (2022). Procedural flexibility in early university mathematics. FMSERA Journal 5, 46-60.

Heinze, A., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and rep-resentations in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 41, 535-540. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11858-009-0214-4

Hästö, P., & Star, J.R. (2024). Strategic flexibility in university mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 71 (7), 917-923.

Hickendorff, M., McMullen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). Mathematical flexibility: The-oretical, methodological, and educational considerations. Journal of Numerical Cog-nition, 8, 326–334. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.10085

Hong, W., Star, J.R., Liu, R.-D., Jiang, R., & Fu, X. (2023). A Systematic review of mathematical flexibility: Concepts, measurements, and related research. Educa-tional Psychology Review, 35, article 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2

Jiang, R., Star, J.R., Hästö, P., Li, L., Liu, R.-D., Tuomela, D., Joglar-Prieto, N., Palkki, R., Abánades, M., & Pejlare, J. (2023). Which one is the “best”: a cross-national comparative study of students’ strategy evaluation in equation solving. Interna-tional Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1127-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10282-6

Liu, R.D., Wang, J., Star, J.R., Zhen, R., Jiang, R.H., & Fu, X.C. (2018). Turning poten-tial flexibility into flexible performance: moderating effect of self-efficacy and use of flexible cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00646

Maciejewski, W. (2022). Between confidence and procedural flexibility in calculus. In-ternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1733-1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1840639

McMullen, J., Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Pongsakdi, N., Hannula-Sormunen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Adaptive number knowledge: exploring the foundations of adaptivity with whole-number arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences Volume 47, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.007

NCTM. (2023). Procedural fluency in mathematics: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Accessed March 31, 2024.

https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/ Proce-dural-Fluency-in-Mathematics/

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

POPS (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

LOPS (2019). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2019. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

Star, J.R., Tuomela, D., Joglar-Prieto, N., Hästö, P., Palkki, R., Abánades, M.Á., Pejla-re, J., Jiang, R.H., Li, L., & Liu, R.D. (2022). Exploring students’ procedural flexibil-ity in three countries. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00322-y

Verschaffel, L. (2024). Strategy flexibility in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Educa-tion, 56, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01491-6

Xu, L., Liu, RD., Star, J.R, Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Zhen, R. (2017). Measures of potential flexibility and practical flexibility in equation solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01368