Encoding discontinuativity by Mari retrospectivizing particle constructions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.147262Keywords:
event modality, discontinuativity, retrospective shift, grammaticalization, Mari languagesAbstract
Discontinuativity is a rarely discussed subcategory of event modality. It marks an event whose circumstantial modal base allows it to continue in so-called inertia worlds outside the actual one, but which eventually fails to do so. This paper analyzes the discontinuative functions of constructions based on the retrospectivizing particles ə̑lˊe and ə̑lˊə̑ in Meadow Mari and Hill Mari, respectively. Though the particle constructions primarily express location of an event in a temporal sphere, I shall present how their perspective properties may also encode a modal perspective towards events in different worlds. A corpus study distinguishes two subtypes of discontinuativity based on the TAME interpretation of the lexical verb in the construction: (1) temporal discontinuatives, which indicate a realized interruption in the normal advancement of an event and (2) modal discontinuatives, which indicate that an interruption might follow. In both types, the constructions mark that the modal evaluation world is detached from the actual world and shifted to the unactualized inertia world, which produces an overt comment on the unexpected or unpreferred arrest of an event. This is a semantic reanalysis of the temporal perspective structure of the constructions, which detaches the perspective time from the utterance time.
References
Data
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey. 2019. Corpora of social media in minority Uralic languages. In Pirinen, Tommi A․ & Kaalep, Heiki-Jaan & Tyers, Francis M․ (eds․), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Uralic Languages, 125–140. Tartu: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-0311 (Last access 2024-6-25.)
Egorkina 2012 = Егоркина, Елизавета. 2012. Ӹлӓ гӹнь шӹдӹр шӱмӹштет… Повесть дон шайыштмаштвлӓ. Йошкар-Ола: Мары книгӓ издательство.
KSYT = Горный, И․ & Кнюшков А․ & Сузы В․ & Матюковкый, Г․ & Захаров С․ (eds․). 1967. Кырык сирышты, Йыл тӹрышты: Лыдышвлӓ, шайыштмаштвлӓ, очерквлӓ. Кокшы выпуск. Йошкар-Ола: Книгам лыкшы мары издательство.
Onchyko = Archive of journal Ончыко within the portal of Mari-Lab. https://mari-lab.ru/index.php?title=Ончыко_(PDF) (Last access 2024-6-25.)
Petukhov 1984 = Петухов, Виталий. 1984. Шӹжвык йӱмы вӹд: Повесть, шайыштмашвлӓ. Йошкар-Ола: Мары книгӓ издательство.
Petukhov 2003 = Петухов, Виталий. 2003. Корны мычкы арава кен: Криминальный повесть. Йошкар-Ола.
Social media corpus = Corpus of Meadow Mari Social Media. The corpora of Uralic Volga–Kama languages. http://volgakama.web-corpora.net/index_en.html (Last access 2024-2-2.)
Valka 2007 = Валька, Ондрин. 2007. Икӓнӓ Опанас: Масаквлӓ․ Шайыштмашвлӓ․ Монологвлӓ. Йошкар-Ола: Республиканский научно-методический центр народного творчества и культурно-досуговой деятельности.
References
Alhoniemi, Alho. 1985. Marin kielioppi (Apuneuvoja suomalais-ugrilaisten kielten opintoja varten X). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Arregui, Ana & Rivero, María Luisa & Salanova Andrés. 2014. Cross-linguistic variation in imperfectivity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32. 307–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9226-4
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Evans, Nicholas. 2005. View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31(1). 93–120. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v31i1.3429
Ferreira, Luiz Fernando & Müller, Ana. 2019. The relevance of future vs․ non-future languages for the understanding of the role of tense in counterfactuals sentences. Revista de Estudos Linguagem, Belo Horizonte 27(2). 1051–1099.
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2016. The semantic ingredients of imperfectivity in progressives, habituals and counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 24. 353–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-016-9127-2
Goeringer, Keith. 1995. The motivation of pluperfect auxiliary tense in the Primary Chronicle. Russian Linguistics 19(3). 319–332.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul J․ & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ippolito, Michela. 2003. Presuppositions and implicatures in counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 11. 145–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024411924818
Isac, Daniela. 2012. Imperatives are modal. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XIV(2). 41–56.
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Dahl, Östen (ed․), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 27–187. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kagan, Olga. 2011. The actual world is abnormal: On the semantics of the bylo construction in Russian. Linguist and Philos 34. 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9093-6
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Student Edition. Dordrecht & Boston & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kashkin et al․ 2023 = Кашкин Е․ В․ (отв․ ред․) & Винклер М․‐Э․ А․ & Давидюк Т․ И․ & Дьячков, В․ В․ & Иванов, В․ А․ & Мордашова, Д․ Д․ & Плешак, П․ С․ & Хомченкова, И․ А. 2023. Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом освещении. Москва: Буки Веди.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Eikmeyer, Hans J․ & Rieser, Hannes (eds․), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics (Research in Text Theory 6), 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1989. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 607–653.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2023. Situations in natural language semantics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (Fall 2023 edn.) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/situations-semantics/
Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342615
Lewis, David. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. London: Blackwell.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14. 15–28.
Niva, Heidi. 2021. Parhaillaan mutta myöhemmin: Olla V-mAssA -rakenne ennakoinnin ja intentioiden ilmaisuissa. Sananjalka 63. 31–54. https://doi.org/10.30673/sja.96098
Nuyts, Jan. 2014. Analyses of the modal meanings. In Nuyts, Jan & van der Auwera, Johan (eds․), Oxford handbook of modality and mood. 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, F․ R. 2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plungian, Vladimir A․ & van der Auwera, Johan. 2006. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Language Typology and Universals 59(4). 317–349. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.317
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74. 760–786. https://doi.org/10.2307/417002
Saarinen, Sirkka. 2022. Mari. In Bakró-Nagy, Marianne & Laakso, Johanna & Skribnik, Elena (eds․), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages. 432–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saraheimo, Mari. 2022. The finite remote past tense in Udmurt: From temporal to modal and pragmatic functions. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 67. 161–203. https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.113825
Savatkova 2002 = Саваткова, А․ А. 2002. Горное наречие марийского языка (Bibliotheca Ceremissica 5). Szombathely: Berzsenyi Dániel Főiskola.
Serebrennikov 1960 = Серебренников, Б․ А. 1960. Категории времени и вида в финно-угорских языках пермской и волжской групп. Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР.
Skribnik, Elena & Kehayov, Petar. 2018. Evidentials in Uralic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y․ (ed․), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. 525–553. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SMYa 1961 = Пенгитов, Н․ Т․ & Галкин, И․ С․ & Исанбаев, Н․ И. 1961. Современный марийский язык: Морфология. Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное издательство.
Spets, Silja-Maija. 2023. Temporal perspective and its formal background: An explanation for aspectual synonymy between simple and analytic past tenses in Mari. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 99. 275–318. https://doi.org/10.33340/susa.123024
Spets, Silja-Maija. 2025. Epistemic perspective of temporal deictics: A study on Mari retrospectivizing particles. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 4(2). 179–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00041.spe
Squartini, Mario. 2014. Interactions between modality and other semantic categories. In Nuyts, Jan & van der Auwera, Johan (eds․), Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 50–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uchaev 1985 = Учаев, З․ В. 1985. Марий йылме: Факультативный занятийым эртарыме учебный пособий. Кокымшо ужаш. Йошкар-Ола: Марий книга издательство.
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1988. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, Jonathan & Moravcsik, J․ M․ E․ & Taylor, C․ C․ W․ (eds․), Human agency: Language, duty and value, 77–101. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
