https://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/issue/feedHallinnon Tutkimus2024-10-25T14:07:55+03:00Harri Jalonenharri.jalonen@uwasa.fiOpen Journal Systems<p>Hallinnon Tutkimus on neljästi vuodessa ilmestyvä tieteellinen aikakauslehti.</p>https://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/145638Monisidosryhmäinnovaatio syntyy tulevaisuuden tulkinnoissa ja arvo-odotuksissa2024-05-13T13:58:45+03:00Ida Parkkinen2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/130311Valtiotieteilijöiden menettelytapatietämys, metakognitio ja näiden vastaavuus työpaikkailmoitusten vaatimusten kanssa2024-02-21T15:50:26+02:00Markku Sippola<p><strong>Social scientists’ procedural knowledge, metacognition, and the correspondence of these to the requirements of job advertisements</strong></p> <p>The study examines the alignment between university students’ reported skills, particularly focusing on procedural knowledge and metacognition, and the skill requirements outlined in job advertisements within the field of social sciences. Data were gathered from career portfolios of 261 social science students, compiled during the 2020-21 academic year, and 179 job advertisements sourced from the Finnish TE Office webpages, collected between 2021 and 2022. The research draws upon a qualitative content analysis of these documents. The results reveal that procedural knowledge and metacognition constitute a category rarely mentioned in the job advertisements. Employers prefer a different type of procedural knowledge from what is discerned in the portfolios. Metacognition skills are highly valued in both the advertisements and portfolios, but collective regulative knowledge is more pronounced in the portfolios.</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/141508Altruismi julkisjohtamisen kehyksenä2024-02-07T09:46:16+02:00Sanni Pöntinen<p><strong>Altruism as a framework for public leadership</strong></p> <p>This article examines altruism as a framework for public leadership. It also aims to analyse the meanings that public leaders attach to altruism in the context of meaningful public leadership. The empirical data consists of interviews with eighteen public leaders. The data has been analysed using antagonistic discourse analysis. Based on the research, it seems that altruism can be considered as a dominant way of thinking and approach in public leadership. Leaders described altruism and its meanings through 57 discourses. The discursive field lacked discourses that described altruism as part of good governance or ethics in public service. Contrasting discourses were the potential for altruism in the private and public sectors and the different motivational bases for altruism.</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/130546Maailman terveysjärjestön legitimiteetti ja legitimiteettikriisit COVID-19-pandemian valossa2024-01-12T08:33:12+02:00Johanna Ketola<p><strong>The legitimacy of the World Health Organization in light of the COVID-19 pandemic</strong></p> <p>This article provides an overview of the legitimacy and the legitimacy crises of the World Health Organization (WHO). During the COVID-19 pandemic, in the era of social media, WHO’s legitimacy crisis has appeared to be historically strong. Based on previous quantitative and qualitative research, the article assesses factors influencing the legitimacy of the WHO. The article identifies the most significant legitimacy crises of the WHO, and examines the similarities and differences between the crises. The legitimacy crises of the WHO are intertwined with infectious disease epidemics. In these situations, the WHO, with its measures and recommendations, becomes under public scrutiny due to increased media visibility. Moreover, the WHO gets merged into international and national political struggles. With the COVID-19 pandemic, research on the legitimacy of the WHO is timely and necessary. Through this comprehensive overview of the...</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/131217Oppimisympäristön turvallisuuden osa-alueet ja tilannekuva2024-04-04T14:50:37+03:00Miika LeinoEila Lindfors<p><strong>Dimensions of safetyt in learning environments and a timely snapshot - Managing safety in basic education based on safety notice reports</strong></p> <p>Reporting safety deviations is a key indicator of safety culture in a community, and safety of learning environments is a constant concern in education. In this study safety is seen as a combination of physical, psychological, social, structural, environmental and pedagogical dimensions of safety. To advance research-based knowledge in recognizing and developing safety in learning environments we posed a research question “<em>what is the state of safety in learning environments in basic education based on safety notice reports filed in by staff?”</em>. The data was collected between 15 comprehensive schools (grades 1-9, students aged 7-16), and total 324 individual safety notice reports form an extensive case study. The data was analyzed according to the dimensions of safety in learning environments. The results reveal that safety notice reports concern ...</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/145368Valvonta ja viestintä työsuojelussa – korjaavaa ja ennaltaehkäisevää toimintaa2024-04-29T16:33:42+03:00Eva MäntymäkiHanna-Kaisa Rajala<p>Katsausartikkeli</p>2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimushttps://journal.fi/hallinnontutkimus/article/view/147150Hyvä analyysi on välttämätön, joskaan ei riittävä ehto hyvälle politiikalle2024-08-05T10:09:05+03:00Harri Jalonen2024-10-25T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2024 Hallinnon Tutkimus