’Kansainvälisen anarkian’ historiografinen uudelleentulkinta

Kirjoittajat

• Eerik Kivilahti Jyväskylän yliopisto https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0872-4411

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70483/kp.179659

Avainsanat:

kansainvälinen anarkia, rakenteellinen realismi, kansainvälinen järjestelmä, historiografia, systeemiteoria

Abstrakti

Rakenteellinen anarkia viittaa tilanteeseen, jossa kansainvälisestä järjestelmästä puuttuu keskitetty, järjestystä tuottava auktoriteetti. Tämä artikkeli tarkastelee, miten kansainvälisen anarkian käsite on rakenteellisessa merkityksessään ymmärretty kansainvälisen politiikan klassikoissa ennen toista maailmansotaa ja sen aikana. Artikkeli esittää, että näillä varhaisilla muotoiluilla on ollut suurempi merkitys myöhemmälle teorialle kuin yleensä tunnustetaan. Hyödyntäen Michael Freedenin ja Felix Berenskoetterin käsiteanalyysimalleja artikkeli analysoi, millaisia käsitteellisiä verkkoja rakenteellisen anarkian ympärille on rakennettu. Artikkelin argumentti on, että Kenneth Waltzin Theory of International Politics -teoksessa esitetty anarkian vaikutusvaltainen muotoilu on merkittävässä määrin velkaa Goldsworthy Dickinsonin aiemmalle muotoilulle. Näin artikkeli tarjoaa historiografisen uudelleentulkinnan kansainvälisen politiikan keskeisen peruskäsitteen kehityksestä.

Lähdeviitteet

Andersen, Morten Skumsrud (2025): ”Anarchy is what the balance of power made of it: Two core concepts and the public/private distinction in International Relations”. International Studies Quarterly, 69(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf064

Angell, Norman (1921): The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to “The Great Illusion”. The Century Co.

Angell, Norman (1933a): ”The international anarchy”. Teoksessa: L. Woolf (toim.) The Intelligent Man’s Way to Prevent War. Victor Gollancz, 19–66.

Angell, Norman (1933b): ”Educational and psychological factors”. Teoksessa: L. Woolf (toim.) The Intelligent Man’s Way to Prevent War. Victor Gollancz, 456–498.

Armitage, David (2006): ”Hobbes and the foundations of modern international thought”. Teoksessa: A. Brett, J. Tully & H. Hamilton-Bleakley (toim.) Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 219–235.

Armitage, David (2013): Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge University Press.

Aron, Raymond (2003/1966): Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Transaction Publishers.

Ashley, Richard (1988): ”Untying the sovereign state: A double reading of the anarchy problematique”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901

Axelrod, Robert (1981): ”The emergence of cooperation among egoists”. The American Political Science Review, 75(2), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961366

Axelrod, Robert (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.

Axelrod, Robert & Keohane, Robert O. (1985): ”Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions”. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357

Barkdull, John (1995): ”Waltz, Durkheim, and international relations: The international system as an abnormal form”. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082981

Berenskoetter, Felix (2016): ”Unpacking concepts”. Teoksessa: F. Berenskoetter (toim.) Concepts in World Politics. Sage, 1–20.

Brown, Michael, Sean Lynn-Jones & Steven Miller (toim.) (1995): The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security. MIT Press.

Brown, William (2006): ”Africa and international relations: A comment on IR theory, anarchy and statehood”. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006954

Bull, Hedley (1977): The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.

Bull, Hedley (1981): ”Hobbes and the international anarchy”. Social Research, 48(4), 717–738. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970843

Butt, Ahsan I. (2013): ”Anarchy and hierarchy in international relations: Examining South America’s war-prone decade, 1932–41”. International Organization, 67(3), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000155

Buzan, Barry & Richard Little (1994): ”The idea of ‘international system’: Theory meets history”. International Political Science Review, 15(3), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500302

Buzan, Barry & Richard Little (1996): ”Reconceptualizing anarchy: Structural realism meets world history”. European Journal of International Relations, 2(4), 403–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002004001

Buzan, Barry & Richard Little (2000): International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford University Press.

Christensen, Thomas (1996): Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton University Press.

Christov, Theodore (2017): ”The invention of Hobbesian anarchy”. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088217720471

Clark, Ian (1989): The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge University Press.

Deudney, Daniel H. (1995): ”The Philadelphian system: Sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861”. International Organization, 49(2), 191–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002837X

Dickinson, G. Lowes (1916): The European Anarchy. The Macmillan Company.

Dickinson, G. Lowes (1926): The International Anarchy, 1904–1914. The Century Co.

Donnelly, Jack (2000): Realism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.

Donnelly, Jack (2006): ”Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society”. European Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 139–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106064505

Donnelly, Jack (2009): ”Rethinking political structures: From ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond”. International Theory, 1(1), 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000037

Donnelly, Jack (2012): ”The elements of the structures of international systems”. International Organization, 66(4), 609–643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000240

Donnelly, Jack (2015): ”The discourse of anarchy in IR”. International Theory, 7(3), 393–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971915000111

Donnelly, Jack (2017): ”Beyond hierarchy”. Teoksessa: A. Zarakol (toim.) Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge University Press. 243–265.

Follett, Mary Parker (1918): The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. Longmans, Green and Co.

Freeden, Michael (1996): Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Clarendon Press.

George, Jim (1995): ”Realist ‘ethics’, international relations, and post-modernism: Thinking beyond the egoism-anarchy thematic”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240020301

Glaser, Charles (1994): ”Realists as optimists: Cooperation as self-help”. International Security, 19(3), 50–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539079

Grieco, Joseph (1988a): ”Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism”. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715

Grieco, Joseph (1988b): ”Realist theory and the problem of international cooperation: Analysis with an amended prisoner’s dilemma model”. The Journal of Politics, 50(3), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131460

Grieco, Joseph (1995): ”The Maastricht treaty, economic and monetary union and the neo-realist research programme”. Review of International Studies, 21(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117504

Grieco, Joseph (1996): ”State interests and institutional rule trajectories: A neorealist interpretation of the Maastricht treaty and European economic and monetary union”. Security Studies, 5(3), 261–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429281

Griffiths, Ryan (2018): ”The Waltzian ordering principle and international change: A two-dimensional model”. European Journal of International Relations, 24(1), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117700478

Gulick, Edward Vose (1943): The Balance of Power. Pacifist Research Bureau.

Grant, A. James ym. (1916): An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Macmillan and Co.

Havercroft, Jonathan & Prichard, Alex (2017): ”Anarchy and international relations theory: A reconsideration”. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088217719911

Heller, Mark (1980): ”The use and abuse of Hobbes: The state of nature in international relations”. Polity, 13(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234689

Herz, John H. (1950): ”Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma”. World Politics, 2(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187

Hicks, Frederick Charles (1920): The ‘New World Order’: International Organization, International Law, International Cooperation. Doubleday, Page & Company.

Hill, David Jayne (1911): World Organization as Affected by the Nature of the Modern State. Columbia University Press.

Hobson, John M. & Jason C. Sharman (2005): ”The enduring place of hierarchy in world politics: Tracing the social logics of hierarchy and political change”. European Journal of International Relations, 11(1), 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137

Hobson, John M. (2014): ”The twin self-delusions of IR: Why ‘hierarchy’ and not ‘anarchy’ is the core concept of IR”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814537364

Holmes, Marcus (2011): ”Something old, something new, something borrowed: Rerepresentations of anarchy in international relations theory”. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr005

Jervis, Robert (1978): ”Cooperation under the security dilemma”. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958

Jervis, Robert (1988): ”Realism, game theory, and cooperation”. World Politics, 40(3), 317–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010216

Keohane, Robert (1984): After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.

Keohane, Robert (1986): ”Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond”. Teoksessa: R. Keohane (toim.) Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press, 158–203.

Kerr, Philip Henry (1935): Pacifism Is Not Enough, Nor Patriotism Either. Clarendon Press.

Kerr, Philip Henry (1941): The American Speeches of Lord Lothian. Oxford University Press.

Kivilahti, Eerik (tulossa): Tragedies of International Anarchy: A Conceptual Study. Väitöskirja, Jyväskylän yliopisto.

Korvela, Paul-Erik (2016): ”Jäähyväiset anarkialle: Myytti kansainvälisestä anarkiasta ja ‘anarkofilian’ synty kansainvälisen politiikan tutkimuksessa”. Kosmopolis, 46(3), 6–19.

Korvela, Paul-Erik (2018): ”Farewell to anarchy: The myth of international anarchy and the birth of anarcophilia in international relations”. Redescriptions, 21(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.7227/r.21.1.3

Lake, David (1996) ”Anarchy, hierarchy, and the variety of international relations”. International Organization, 50(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830000165X

Lake, David (2009): Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell University Press.

Lechner, Silviya (2017): ”Anarchy in international relations”. Teoksessa: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore9780190846626-e-79?print=pdf

Mattern, Janice Bially & Ayşe Zarakol (2016): ”Hierarchies in world politics”. International Organization, 70(3), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818316000126

McConaughey, Meghan, Paul Musgrave & Daniel H. Nexon (2018): ”Beyond anarchy: Logics of political organization, hierarchy, and international structure”. International Theory, 10(2), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971918000040

Mearsheimer, John J. (1994): ”The false promise of international institutions”. International Security, 19(3), 5–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078

Mearsheimer, John J. (2001): The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.

Mercer, Jonathan (1995): ”Anarchy and identity”. International Organization, 49(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028381

Milner, Helen (1991): ”The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique”. Review of International Studies, 17(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050011232X

Moon, Parker T. (1925): Syllabus on International Relations. The Macmillan Company.

Niebuhr, Reinhold (1932): Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Niebuhr, Reinhold (1940): Christianity and Power Politics. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Onuf, Nicholas & Frank F. Klink (1989): ”Anarchy, authority, rule”. International Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600535

Oye, Kenneth (toim.) (1986): Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton University Press.

Parent, Joseph (2024): ”Introduction: Waltzian theory and the return of power politics”. Security Studies, 33(5), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2024.2411200

Posen, Barry (1984): The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Cornell University Press.

Potter, Pitman B. (1922): An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. The Century Company.

Powell, Robert (1994): ”Anarchy in international relations theory: The neorealist-neoliberal debate”. International Organization, 48(2), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204

Prichard, Alex (2016): ”Anarchy”. Teoksessa: F. Berenskoetter (toim.) Concepts in World Politics. Sage Publications, 25–141.

Rose, Gideon (1998): ”Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy”. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814

Rosenberg, Justin (1994): The Empire of Civil Society. A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Verso.

Ruggie, John (1983): ”Continuity and transformation in the world polity: Toward a neorealist synthesis”. World Politics, 35(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010273

Sampson, Aaron (2002): ”Tropical anarchy: Waltz, Wendt, and the way we imagine international politics”. Alternatives, 27(4), 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700402

Schmidt, Brian (1998): The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. State University of New York Press.

Schuman, Frederick Lewis (1941): International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. 3. painos. McGraw-Hill.

Schroeder, Paul (1994): ”Historical reality vs. neo-realist theory”. International Security, 19(1), 108–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539150

Schweller, Randall (1994): ”Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in”. International Security, 19(1), 72–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149

Schweller, Randall (1998): Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. Columbia University Press.

Snyder, Jack (1991): Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Cornell University Press.

Snyder, Jack (2002): ”Anarchy and culture: Insights from the anthropology of war”. International Organization, 56(1), 7–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802753485124

Spykman, Nicholas J. (1942): America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (1997): ”Realist environment, liberal process, and domestic-level variables”. International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00031

Teschke, Benno (2003): The Myth of 1648. Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations. Verso.

Van Evera, Stephen (1998): ”Offense, defense, and the causes of war”. International Security, 22(4), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539239

Van Evera, Stephen (1999): Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Cornell University Press.

Walker, Rob B.J. (1993): Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Walt, Stephen (1987): The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University Press.

Waltz, Kenneth N. (1959): Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.

Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979): Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.

Waltz, Kenneth N. (1986): ”Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics”. Teoksessa: R. Keohane (toim.) Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press, 322–345.

Waltz, Kenneth N. (1996): ”International politics is not foreign policy”. Security Studies, 6(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429298

Watson, Adam (1992): The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge.

Watson, Adam (1997): The Limits of Independence. Relations between States in the Modern World. Routledge.

Wendt, Alexander (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Wendt, Alexander & Daniel Friedheim (1995): ”Hierarchy under anarchy: Informal empire and the East German state”. International Organization, 49(4), 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028484

Williams, Michael (1996): ”Hobbes and international relations: A reconsideration”. International Organization, 50(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002854X

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958/1953): Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell.

Wohlforth, William (1993): The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Cornell University Press.

Zakaria, Fareed (1998): From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of Americas World Role. Princeton University Press.