Top
Nordic Yearbook of Population Research

Assessing the Accuracy of National Population Projections
A Case Study of Norway

Authors

Michael Thomas
Statistics Norway, Research Department
Astri Syse
Norwegian Institute for Public Health, formerly Statistics Norway, Research Department
Adrian Rogne
University of Oslo, Department of Sociology and Social Geography
Rebecca Gleditsch
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, formerly Statistics Norway, Research Department

DOI

https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.109057

Files

View PDF

Abstract

Few producers of official population projections provide regular evaluations of past projection inaccuracies. This paper assesses deviations between the projected and registered total population for Norway (1996–2018), as well as deviations in the age structure, total fertility rate and number of births, period life expectancy at birth and number of deaths, and net international migration. Projected life expectancy was consistently lower than the real development. Few systematic deviations were observed for fertility up to 2009, but thereafter fertility has been consistently overprojected. However, the deviations between projected and realised trends in births and deaths have been relatively small as compared to those for net international migration. The projections produced between 1996–2005 underestimated long-term population growth due primarily to the unforeseen increase in immigration following EU expansion in 2004. More recent projections contain no consistent under- or overprojection of net migration and the deviations for the total population have been moderate.

Files

View PDF

References

Ascher, W. (1979). Forecasting, an appraisal for policy-makers and planners. London:The John Hopkins Press Ltd.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1971840

de Beer, J. (2000). Dealing with uncertainty in population forecasting. Voorburg: Department of Population, Statistics Netherlands.

de Beer, J. (2011). Transparency in population forecasting: Methods for fitting and projecting fertility, mortality and migration. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Bijak, J. (2011). Forecasting international migration in Europe: A Bayesian view. London: Springer Science & Business Media.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8897-0

Bohk-Ewald, C., Li, P. & Myrskalä, M. (2018). Forecast accuracy hardly improves with method complexity when completing cohort fertility. PNAS 115(37), 9187-92.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722364115

Cappelen, A., Skjerpen, T. & Tonnessen, M. (2015). Forecasting immigration in official population projections using an econometric model. International Migration Review 49(4), 945-80.

https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12092

Chi, G. & Wang D. (2018). Population projection accuracy: The impact of sociodemographics, accessibility, land use, and neighbour characteristics. Population Space Place 24(5), e2129. DOI: 10.1002/psp.2129.

https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2129

Disney, G., Wiśniowski, A., Forster, J. J., Smith, P. W. F. & Bijak, J. (2015). Evaluation of existing migration forecasting methods and models. Southampton: University of Southampton.

European Commission (2016). Joint report on health care and long-term care systems and fiscal sustainability. Vol 1. Paper 037/2016. Online at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/ip037_faq_en_2.pdf.

Gleditsch, R. F., Syse, A, & Thomas, M. (2021a). Fertility projections in a European context: A survey of current practices among statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics 37(3), 547-68.

https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0025

Gleditsch, R. F., Rogne, A. F., Syse, A. & Thomas, M. (2021b). The accuracy of Statistics Norway's national population projections. Discussion Paper 948, Statistics Norway.

Hyndman, R. J. & Ullah, S. (2007). Robust forecasting of mortality and fertility rates: A functional data approach. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 4942-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.07.028

Hyndman, R. J., Booth, H. & Yasmeen, F. (2013). Coherent mortality forecasting: the product-ratio method with functional time series models. Demography, 50, 261-83.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0145-5

Janssen, F. (2018). Advances in mortality forecasting: introduction. Genus, 74(21), 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-018-0045-7

Keilman, N. (1997). Ex-post error in official population forecasts in industrialized countries. Journal of Official Statistics, 13(3), 245-77.

Keilman, N. (2007). UK national population projections in perspective: How successful compared to those in other European countries? Population Trends, 129, 20-30.

Keilman, N. (2008). European demographic forecasts have not become more accurate over the past 25 years. Population and Development Review, 34, 137-53. 56

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00209.x

Keilman, N. & Pham, D. Q. (2004). Empirical and predicted errors in fertility, mortality and migration forecasts in the European Economic Area. Discussion Papers No. 386. Statistics Norway.

Khan, H. T. & Lutz, W. (2008). How well did past UN population projections anticipate demographic trends in six South-east Asian countries? Asian Population Studies, 4(1), 77-95.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730801966964

Keyfitz, N. (1981). The limits of population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 7(4), 579-93.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1972799

Keyfitz, N. & Caswell, H. (2005). Applied mathematical demography. 3rd ed. New York: Springer.

Lee, R. D. & Carter, L.R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of American Statistical Association, 87, 659-71.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475265

Li, N. & Lee, R. (2005). Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of populations: An extension of the Lee-Carter method. Demography, 42, 575-94.

https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0021

Lutz, W. & Goldstein, J. R. (2004). Introduction: How to deal with uncertainty in population forecasting? International Statistical Review, 72(1), 1-4.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2004.tb00219.x

National Research Council (2000). Beyond six billion: Forecasting the world's population. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Online at: https://doi.org/10.17226/9828.

https://doi.org/10.17226/9828

OECD (2019a). Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (2019b). Health spending projections to 2030: New results based on a revised

OECD methodology. OECD Health Working Paper No. 110. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pettersen, S. (2013). Emigration from Norway 1971-2011. [In Norwegian]. Reports, 2013/30, Statistics Norway.

Raymer, J. & Wiśniowski, A. (2018). Applying and testing a forecasting model for age and sex patterns of immigration and emigration. Population Studies, 72(3), 339-355.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2018.1469784

Rogne, A. F. (2016). How accurate are the Norwegian national population projections? [In Norwegian]. Economic Analysis, 2016/3. Statistics Norway.

Shaw, C. (2007). Fifty years of United Kingdom national population projections: how accurate have they been? Population Trends, 128, 8-22.

Skjerpen, T. & Tonnessen, M. (2020). Using future age profiles to improve immigration projections, Population Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1794019.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1794019

Smith, S. K., Tayman, J. & Swanson, D. A. (2006). State and local population projections: Methodology and analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Stoto, M. A. (1983). The accuracy of population projections. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(381), 13-20.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10477916

Syse, A. & Pham, D. Q. (2014). Population projections 2014-2100: Mortality and life expectancy. [In Norwegian] Economic Analysis, 2014/4. Statistics Norway.

Syse, A., Thomas, M. & Gleditsch, R. (2020). Norway's 2020 national population projections. Reports, 2020/25, Statistics Norway.

Texmon, I. & Keilman, N. (1991). An evaluation of Norwegian population forecasts. Experiences from the period 1969-87. Technical Reports, No. 53, 97-120.

Tonnessen, M. (2014). Fertility and other demographics of immigrants and their children born in Norway. Reports, 2014/4. Statistics Norway.

United Nations (2013). Population Facts 2013/10. New York: United Nations. Online at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/popfacts/ popfacts_2013-10.pdf.

United Nations (2018). Recommendations on communicating population projections.

UNECE, ECE/CES/STAT/ 2018/1. Online at: https:/www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stas/publications/2018/ECECESSTAT20181.pdf.

Wilson, T. (2007). The forecast accuracy of Australian Bureau of Statistics national population projections. Journal of Population Research, 24(1), 91-117.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031880

Zhang, L. (2008). Developing methods for determining the number of unauthorized immigrants in Norway. Documents, 2008/11, Statistics Norway.

Details

DOI
Published
June 27, 2022
Issue
Section
Articles
Keywords Accuracy, Errors, Methods, Fertility, Mortality, Migration, Population projections
How to Cite
Thomas, M., Syse, A., Rogne, A., & Gleditsch, R. (2022). Assessing the Accuracy of National Population Projections: A Case Study of Norway. Nordic Yearbook of Population Research, 56, 31-64. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.109057
License

Copyright (c) 2022 Rebecca Gleditsch, Michael Thomas, Adrian Rogne, Astri Syse

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Nordic Yearbook of Population Research agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CC0 4.0 Universal (CC BY 4.0)