Rethinking the ‘Liturgy After the Liturgy’ with Schmemann, Zizioulas, and Bulgakov

Kirjoittajat

• Fr Mark Roosien Yale University Divinity School https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6213-8519

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61560/ortodoksia.147742

Avainsanat:

Alexander Schmemann, John Zizioulas, Sergius Bulgakov, teologia, liturgia, sosiaalinen toiminta, ortodoksisuus

Abstrakti

Contemporary Orthodox thinking about the role of church in society is fragmented. Is it possible to give an Orthodox theological justification for social action? What kind of actions or arrangements would it recommend? Today, Orthodox political theologies range from United Nations-style liberalism to militarist versions of neo-Byzantine symphonia, to reactionary pockets of apocalyptic sectarianism. Although there is no single approach for how Orthodox Christians should act in society, there is one concept that seems to comprise a promising theological starting point for Orthodox social action: the ‘liturgy after the liturgy.’ This concept, formulated in the twentieth century, represents an attempt to unite what Christians do outside the walls of the church with what the church does inside, in worship. Modern Orthodox theologians hold that the church is called to manifest the Kingdom of God in its liturgy. Can extra-liturgical Christian social action also manifest the Kingdom of God? The notion of the ‘liturgy after the liturgy’ answers in the affirmative. While maintaining that liturgical worship holds a place of primacy as the church’s chief act, it frames extra-liturgical action as an important and necessary aspect of the church’s mission in the world. But as this article argues, despite its promise, the concept is too imprecise and under-theorized to demarcate the boundaries of appropriate Christian social action, and thus can used to justify almost any extra-liturgical action, no matter how objectionable, if it is blessed by church authorities. A better way to think through Orthodox Christian engagement in society, this article holds, is to focus on the notion of the Kingdom of God, which the liturgy, and perhaps the ‘liturgy after the liturgy,’ are supposed to manifest. The Kingdom of God is of major theological concern for modern Orthodox thinkers, three of whom are brought into conversation here: Alexander Schmemann, John Zizioulas, and Sergius Bulgakov. Each of them locates the liturgy as the primary site of the manifestation of the Kingdom of God in history, but they differ on the extent to which extra-liturgical social action can also manifest the Kingdom. The conversation staged between these thinkers sharpens the questions at play in the discussion of the relationship between liturgy and social action in Orthodox theology.

Lähdeviitteet

Afanasiev, Nicholas (2007). The Church of the Holy Spirit. Michael Plekon (editor), Vitaly Permiakov (translator). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.

Bria, Ion (1996). Liturgy after the Liturgy: Mission and Witness from an Orthodox Perspective. Geneva: WCC Publications.

Bulgakov, Sergius (2021a). On the Kingdom of God. In Roberto J. De La Noval (transl.), The Sophiology of Death: Essays on Eschatology: Personal, Political, Universal. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 9–28.

Bulgakov, Sergius (2021b). The Soul of Socialism (Part II). In Roberto J. De La Noval (transl.), The Sophiology of Death: Essays on Eschatology: Personal, Political, Universal. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 29–39.

Bulgakov, Sergius (2002). The Bride of the Lamb. Boris Jakim (translator). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Chauvet, Louis-Marie (2001). The Sacraments: The Word of God at the Mercy of the Body. Madeleine Beaumont (translator). Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Clément, Olivier (1980). The Sacrament of the Brother/the Sister. In Jether Pereira Ramalho (ed.), Signs of Hope and Justice. Geneva: World Council of Churches, 24–27.

Coman, Viorel (2018). The Sacramentality of the Church in Dumitru Stăniloae’s Theology. Pro Ecclesia 27, 203–224.

De La Noval, Roberto J. (2020). Sophiology in Suspension: The Theological Condemnations of Fr Sergius Bulgakov. Diss. University of Notre Dame.

Department of External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate (2000). Foundations of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church. http://orthodoxeurope.org/page/3/14.aspx. Accessed on February 15, 2025.

Fedotov, George (1939). Liubov’ i sotsiologiia. Pravoslavnoe Delo 1, 62–83.

FitzGerald, Thomas (2004). Divergent Trends in the World Council of Churches: Major Orthodox Concerns. Greek Orthodox Theological Review 49, 105–134.

Florovsky, Georges (1989). Ecumenism I: A Doctrinal Approach. The Collected Works of Georges Florovsky, volume 13. Belmont, MA: Büchervertriebsanstalt.

Florovsky, Georges (1952). The Ever-Virgin Mother. In E.L. Mascall (ed.), The Mother of God, a Symposium. Westminster: Dacre Press, 51–63.

Gschwandtner, Christina M. (2018). Grounding Ecological Action in Orthodox Theology and Liturgical Praxis? A Call for Further Thinking. Journal of Orthodox Christian Studies 1, 61–77.

Harper, Demetrios (2022). Tradition and Transfiguration: Understanding the Orthodox Theological Foundations of the Role of the Church in the Public Sphere. Studies in Christian Ethics 35, 328–341.

Hart, David Bentley and John Chryssavgis (ed.) (2022). For the Life of the World: Toward a Social Ethos of the Orthodox Church. Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.

Hovorun, Cyril (2022a). For the Life of the World and Orthodox Political Theology. Theology Today 78, 347–356.

Hovorun, Cyril (2022b). Russian Church and Ukrainian War. Expository Times 134, 1–10.

Louth, Andrew (2007). Eastern Orthodox Eschatology. In Jerry L. Walls (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 233–247.

Morrill, Bruce T. (2000). Anamnesis as Dangerous Memory: Political and Liturgical Theology in Dialogue. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Morrill, Bruce T. (2019). The Liturgical is Political. In Porter C. Taylor (ed.), We Give Our Thanks unto Thee: Essays Honoring Fr. Alexander Schmemann. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 183–200.

Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2004). Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Riccardi-Swartz, Sarah (2022). Between Heaven and Russia: Religious Conversion and Political Apostasy in Appalachia. New York: Fordham University Press.

Russian Orthodox Church (2024). Наказ XXV Всемирного русского народного собора “Настоящее и будущее Русского мира,” 27 Марта 2024. Patriarchia.ru. http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/6116189.html. Seen 15 February 2025.

Schmemann, Alexander (1988). The Eucharist: Sacrament of the Kingdom. Paul Kachur (translator). Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Schmemann, Alexander (1966). Introduction to Liturgical Theology. Asheleigh E. Moorhouse (translator). Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Yannoulatos, Anastasios (2010). Mission in Christ’s Way. Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.

Zizioulas, John D. (2011). The Eucharistic Communion and the World. Luke Ben Tallon (editor). London: T&T Clark.

Zizioulas, John D. (2010). The One and the Many: Studies on God, Man, the Church, and the World Today. Gregory Edwards (editor). Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press.

Zizioulas, John D. (2008). Lectures in Christian Dogmatics. Douglas Knight (editor). London: T&T Clark.

Федотов, Георгий (1939). Любовь и социология. Православное дело 1, 62–83.