The Hindu Confrontation with the Jaina and the Buddhist Saint Tiruñãnacampantar ' s Polemical Writings

The history of Tamilnadu is fairly clear for a little more than two thousand years. There is an abundant output of literary works and considerable epigraphical material in a continuous tradition throughout this period. For the first six hundred years of the Christian era, epigraphical material is meagre. The available epigraphical material refers to the presence of Jaina monks in caves, thickly concentrated around Madurai at the initial stage and then scattered to all the different regions of Tamilnadu. Circumstantial evidence points to the presence of Buddhist and Ajivaka monks also in Tamilnadu during that ancient period (Mahalingam: 1967, 161-192; Mahadevan 1970: 14). It is a matter for surprise that the Carikam literature, the most ancient phase of Tamil literature, generally ascribed to the first three centuries of the Christian era, is secular in character (Zvelebil 1974: 7). In this literature there are clear references to Brahmins and Vedic sacrifices, as well as some forms of indigenous worship, besides some references to Hindu Gods (Vithiananthan 1954: 106-152). Attempts have been made to trace Jaina, Buddhist and Ajivaka influence in Cankam literature, but such influence does not seem to be significant. The picture of religious history in Tamilnadu undergoes a change in the Post-Cankam period, covering the second three hundred years of the Christian era. For some time there was political turmoil in Tamilnadu and there was what was sometimes referred to as the Dark Age of the Kalabhra Interregnum (Nilakanta Sastri 1966: 144). Though only very


Introduction
The history of Tamilnadu is fairly clear for a little more than two thousand years.There is an abundant output of literary works and considerable epigraphical material in a continuous tradition throughout this period.For the first six hundred years of the Christian era, epigraphical material is meagre.The available epigraphical material refers to the presence of Jaina monks in caves, thickly concentrated around Madurai at the initial stage and then scattered to all the different regions of Tamilnadu.Circumstantial evidence points to the presence of Buddhist and Ajivaka monks also in Tamilnadu during that ancient period (Mahalingam: 1967, 161-192;Mahadevan 1970: 14).It is a matter for surprise that the Carikam literature, the most ancient phase of Tamil literature, generally ascribed to the first three centuries of the Christian era, is secular in character (Zvelebil 1974: 7).In this literature there are clear references to Brahmins and Vedic sacrifices, as well as some forms of indigenous worship, besides some references to Hindu Gods ( Vithiananthan 1954: 106-152).Attempts have been made to trace Jaina, Buddhist and Ajivaka influence in Cankam literature, but such influence does not seem to be significant.
The picture of religious history in Tamilnadu undergoes a change in the Post-Cankam period, covering the second three hundred years of the Christian era.For some time there was political turmoil in Tamilnadu and there was what was sometimes referred to as the Dark Age of the Kalabhra Interregnum (Nilakanta Sastri 1966: 144).Though only very little is known of this period, what is known points to the Jains and the Buddhists establishing some sort of ascendancy.By the end of the sixth century A.D., the Kalabhra rule in Tamilnadu was overthrown in the north by the Pallavas and in the south by the Pandyas.The Jains had already established themselves so firmly that both the Pallava and Pandya rulers became converts to Jainism.
The Vedic religion of the Brahmins had transformed itself into popular Hinduism during this period.There was a revival of Hinduism with the appearance of Puranic literature during the Gupta period.Siva and Visnu became the leading deities of Hinduism.Some indigenous forms of worship in Tamilnadu were also assimilated into Hinduism.The Bhakti movement, both of the Saiva and the Vaisnava variety, made their appearance in Tamilnadu before the seventh century A.D. (Chelvanayagam 1960: 60-63).
The seventh century A.D. was a period of religious conflict when Hinduism, especially the Saiva Bhakti movement came to collusion with Jainism and Buddhism in Tamilnadu.This century marked a turning point in its religious history.Both the Pallava and the Pandya rulers were converted to Saivism, which then became the dominant creed of Tamilnadu.Henceforth, almost up to the beginning of the twentieth century, Tamil literature became mainly religious literature.Tirunavukkaracu nayanar and Tiruñanacampantamurtti nayanar were mainly responsible for this transformation.Saint Tirunavukkaracu, who was twice a convert, first from Saivism to Jainism and then from Jainism to Saivism, worked some miracles to save himself from Jaina -inspired attempts to kill him and influenced the conversion of Mahendravarman I, the Pallava ruler to Saivism (Nilakant a Sastri 1966: 243).Saint Tiruñanacampantamurtti (henceforth referred to as Campantar), a young prodigy and a junior contemporary of the former saint, converted Netumaran, the Pandya ruler to Saivism.He is also credited with worsting the Buddhists in a debate and converting them to Saivism (Cekkilar 1955: 330-364' Campantar is a dominating figure in Tamil Saivism.Panniru Tirumurai, "The Twelve Sacred Books", is the primary base of Tamil Saivism.Campantar's hymns form the first three books of these twelve.384 decads `patikam of hymns' are found in the three compilations.Öne decad from Tiruvitaivay, not included in the three books, has been recovered from an inscription.Numerically, his hymns exceed those of any other Nayanar or Vaisnava Alvar.In Periyapuranam, the Saiva hagiology of Cekkilar, Campantar's biography is the main theme, occupying almost one-third of the whole epic (Cekkilar 1955).2Even from the point of view of polemical writings, Campantar had no equal among the other Nayanmars or the Alvars.Only stray references are available in the hymns of the other saints.Except in very rare cases, each of Campantar's hymns consists of eleven verses and out of these eleven, the tenth verse has criticism of the Jains and the Buddhists.A few decads have twelve verses and in them there is a variation in the number of the verse as either the ninth, the tenth or the eleventh where criticism of the non-Vedic religions occur.It is remarkable that this criticism occurs even in the first hymn composed by this saint when he was said to be just three years old (Cekkilar 1955: 276-277; see verse 79).About 25 out of 385 hymns do not have these polemical references and the reason for this is not clear.Campantar had his main confrontation with the Jains in Madurai and in each of the verses in four hymns which he composed in honour of the Lord of Tiruvalavay in Madurai, he was attacking the Jains.So, roughly about four hundred verses are available for scrutiny here.According to tradition, Campantar lived for sixteen years only.Saint Cuntaramurtti, who lived in the eighth or early ninth century, had praised both Campantar and Tirunavukkaracar.
The Tevaram hymns of Tirunavukkaracar, Campantar and Cuntaramurtti had been collected and codified as the first seven tirumurai by Nampi Antar Nampi under the patronage of Rajaraja I at the beginning of the eleventh century A.D. Cuntaramurtti had already referred to the contemporary and earlier Saiva saints in his Tiruttontattokai in a concise form.Nampi Ántar Nampi elaborated the references in that hymn into 87 verses in his Tiruttontar Tiruvantati.He seems to have developed a particular fascination for Campantar among all the Saiva saints.Öf the other seven prabandha literary works which he authored, six were devoted to praises of Campantar's greatness.All these seven prabandhas were later included in the eleventh tirurnurai.It is in these prabandhas that we first come to hear that Campantar had caused the impalement of 8,000 Jaina monks living on eight hills around Madurai (Patinoran 1933: 280-324).3For almost four centuries after Campantar, there is no reference at all to 2 1256 verses out of 4286 verses in all.
Parañcoti, who composed another version of Tiruvidaiyatar Puranam, made slight changes to the story, maybe to exonerate Campantar of his guilt, as alleged in the well-meaning Vempattfirar's work.When Campantar sought permission from Lord Siva, he replied that the Jains would lose and suffer impalement.So, according to Parañcoti, the initial suggestion about impalement originated from Siva.
Cekkilar, the author of Periyapurauam, the twelfth Tirumurai of the aivites, seems to have a balanced perspective.There is evidence to believe that Cekkilar made a thorough study of Tevaram collections and did a lot of field work throughout Tamilnadu to equip himself for the composition of his epic (Iracamanikkanar 1948: 180-188).He must have collected traditions and myths about the Saiva saints and he had to incorporate them in his work as far as possible.He could not ignore a person of Nampi Antar Nampi's calibre when the latter had been emphasizing the story of impalement of the Jains in many prabandhas.So, Cekkildr narrates the story but without putting the blame on Campantar.
Öttakkattar, a contemporary of Cekkilar, a court poet of three Cola emperors and one of the Kaviccakkaravartti 'Emperor among poets' of the Cola Empire, narrates a slightly different version in his Takkaydkapparani (Öttakkuttar 1930: 171-220).This version also exonerates Campantar of all personal responsiblity.Considering the fact that Cekkilar himself was a minister of the Cola court, it becomes clear that there were different versions of the story even in the twelfth century A.D., within the court circles of the Cola Emperor.
So, there is no contemporary or even immediately late contemporary evidence whatsoever for the allegation of Campantar's impalement of 8,000 Jains from eight hills around Madurai.The map showing the sites of ancient Tamil Brahmi inscriptions clearly indicates that the Pandya country, and especially the region around Madurai was the chosen area of operations for the Jaina monks and possibly for the Buddhist monks also.It seems to have taken a long time of about eight hundred years to gain almost complete control over the Pandya country.The story of impalement of the Jains, gaining currency almost four centuries after Campantar, continued to have credence till recently without being challenged for its veracity.

T. P. Meenakshisundaran brought out a good publication in Tamil on
Campantar and the Jains about thirty-four years ago (Meenaksisundaran 1957: 1-160).He cleared up some preliminary issues.He pointed out that there are three aspects to the problem.Whether a massacre of such magnitude could have occurred, whether an impalement of a few Jains could have occurred and whether Campantar could have been responsible for the massacre were the questions raised and answered negatively in each case by Meenakshisundaran.He showed that Campantar was broadminded and that the latter was mainly critical of extreme and insincere ascetic practices only of the Jains and the Buddhists.About a third of his book deals with the explanation for Campantar's dislike under seven sub-headings.'His work is an inspiration to the present writer to probe deeply into the matter and to assess why Campantar's polemical writings had given rise to the story of impalement of the Jains.

Campantar's Personality
First of all, it is useful to form an idea of the powerful personality of Campantar.His hymns should be the primary source while Periyapurauam could be a secondary source.He seems to reflect a unique blend of Vedic tradition, Saiva faith and Tamil culture.How Campantar identifies with Tamil culture is worthy of detailed study.This identification is usually found in the eleventh or the last verse of each hymn.His hymn and in some cases, each verse of his hymn are referred to as Tamil, presumably referring to the expression of Tamil culture in Tamil language.It is customary to refer to the Pandya country as the Tamil country.Though there is some controversy among medieval commentators as to the boundaries of Centamilnatu, it is generally accepted that the region around Madurai constituted the core of that region.Cekkilar has referred to the Pandya country as the Tamilnadu even within Tirufidnacampantamdriti nayanar Puranam.Campantar refers to his home town as centamil parappuru tiruppukali 'Sacred Pukali that disseminates classical Tamil'.5As far as available evidence goes, Cirkali did not have any historical claim of disseminating classical Tamil.Tillai or Citamparam, very close to Cirkali, has been glorified as temple par excellence of the Saivites and the three thousand Brahmins of that shrine have claimed a higher status and exclusive privileges even within the Brahmin community.Cuntaramurtti, in his Tiruttontattokai, raises the status of all the Tillai Brahmins to the status of saints.Campantar refers to Tamilal uyarntar urai Tillai `Citamparam, where those who came up through Tamil, dwell'.6Neither Citamparam nor the Brahmins from Citamparam have made any significant contributions to Tamil, up to the age of Campantar.Campantar seems to be using that word in a special sense to refer to Tamil Vedic Saivism which he was championing and to the formation of which Tillai Brahmins might have contributed substantially.
Campantar was able to play the language card against the Jains because they were using Prakrit as their sacred language.He was accusing them of Akamattotu mantirarikal amainta cankata parikama ppakatattotu iraitturaittu 'having made loud noises in Prakrit, a corrupt form of Sanskrit in reciting their sacred texts and incantations'.'There is evidence from literary and epigraphical sources to indicate that Sanskrit was displacing Prakrit and Päli in Tamilnadu from about the fifth century A.D. The Pallava kings who first used Prakrit in their early inscriptions began to use Sanskrit in their inscriptions from about this time.Dandin composed Kavyadarsa in Sanskrit in the Pallava court.The Buddhist monks from Kañci also began to use Sanskrit.The Sanskrit scholars consider Prakrit a corrupt form of Sanskrit.The Saiva poet-saint seems to have shared their attitude.He also blames the Jains for not being aware of the use of Sanskrit and literary Tamil, ariyattotu centamil ppayan arikila.8 Probably, the Jain monks were using colloquial language to appeal to the Tamil masses.Even though Campantar refers to the Jains here, this blame might have been equally applicable to the Buddhists also, as could be inferred from Vfracoliyam, a Tamil grammatical work by a Buddhist author, which gives importance to colloquial Tamil.Here too, the Saiva saint could be sharing the prejudice of many Tamil grammarians that colloquial Tamil was a corrupt form of classical Tamil.He seems to imply that people using corrupt forms of language must have been themselves corrupt.Probably the Jains and the Buddhists had not adopted proper nativization or indigenization of their religions in Tamil.
Campantar was a proud Brahmin as well as a proud Tamilian.He claims to be marai ñanacampantan,9 nanmarai ñanacampantan" and arumarai ñanacampantan" besides as pucuran `deva in the earth' to claim excellence as a Brahmin.His claims as a Tamilian are far more impressive: Tamil ñanacampantan" narramil ñanacampantan"; cen Tamilan ñanacampantan", Tamil virakan", Tamil virakinan17, muttamil virakan", Tamilakaran" and Tamil currumurrumayinan.20He has combined his claims for both honours in a few places as in muttamil nanmarai ñanacampantan2' and nanmarai navan narramilkkin turai ñanacampantan."When he claims to be a pti tcuran, he is not claiming a personal honour.That he was claiming only a caste honour becomes apparent when he refers to the Brahmins generally as piicurar and its synonym of taraittevar." Campantar owed his dislike of the Buddhists and the Jains to his family background.Jainism and Buddhism originated as revolts against Vedic sacrifices and Brahmin domination and it is no surprise that orthodox Brahmin circles viewed with alarm the growing popularity of those religions in Tamilnadu.But Campantar's family could have had some special reason also.According to Periyapuranam, Campantar's mother Pakavati hailed from Tirunanipalli, south of Kaviri (Cekkilar 1955: 280, verse 109).Palli generally denotes a temple of the heretical religions and pali generally denotes a monastic establishment of the same religions.Campantar has used both these words in the above senses."There is evidence from other sources that the Buddhists had established themselves in certain parts of the Cola country (Veluppillai 1980: 86-116).In fact, even according to Periyapuranam, Campantar's confrontation with the Buddhists occurs in the Cola country (Cekkilar 1955: 361, verse 904).Through a study of the life-history of some saints in Periyapuranam, Mayilai Cini Venkatacami has shown that there were certain pockets of Jainism in the Cola country (Venkatacami 1954).So, Tirunanipalli must have been either a Jaina or a Buddhist or a Jaina-Buddhist locality where there was also a temple for Siva.
The Tirunanipalli Brahmins were probably on the defensive against the rising tide of heretical religions.When they came to know that Campantar was a rising star in the cause of Saivism and that he had started on a pilgrimage to Siva temples in and around Cirkali, they went on a deputation to invite him to his mother's village, probably to gain some inspiration.At Tirunanipalli, it was probably the grievance of the Brahmins that the poorer sections of the people went over to the heretical religions.In his hymn on Tirunanipalli, Campantar accuses the Buddhist and the Jaina monks of being only interested in food."So, most probably, Pakavati, his mother instilled into Campantar's young mind an intense dislike for the heretical religions.
It is also important to note how Campantar viewed himself Instead of the Sanskrit derivative nayanar, he uses its Tamil equivalent of talaivan.26 He seems to be more fond of equating himself with king or chieftain as can be noticed in the use of words kavalan", man", mannan", ventan", kulapati" and Icon'.The Tamil word forms irai and iraivan can mean king but later day usage has specialised them as god.Campantar uses both these forms to refer to himself.33The word peruman, considered to be a derivative of the earlier Tamil word perumakan, denotes king occasionally but god generally.Campantar calls himself peruman in two places."He is very self confident.In two places, he uses the expression, anai namate, which could be translated as 'on my authority'."It is in those verses that he claims to be a munivan, equivalent to Sanskrit rsi.In one of those verses, he claims to have mystical knowledge."He is very certain about the great worth of his hymns."In the hymn which is being addressed to the Pandya queen in Madurai where he reiterates that he is not afraid of the Jains, he refers to the Pandya king as muti tennavan, `the crowned king of the south', and to himself as pukalikku man Tamil natan 'King of Pukali, Lord of Tamil'.38 'Saintly lord' (Hardy 1983: 69) is probably a better designation for him.

Campantar's Positive View
Campantar was aware that Jainism and Buddhism had great appeal among the masses and that these religions had a positive side.These religions were emphasizing ethics as a way of life.Under Jaina authorship or Jaina inspiration, a number of Tamil ethical works were written and were later included in the collection Patinen Kilkkanakku 'Eighteen Minor Works'.Nalatiyar, clearly a work of Jaina authorship, is very much sought after even now.The religion of the author of Tirukkural is still a matter of controversy but no serious scholar doubts Jaina inspiration on its author.The Jaina monks were generally learned people and Campantar acknowledged it when he refers to them as karramanar.39The expression the term kon.aravurai, 'Discourse on Dharma' is used by him in a number of hymns4° to refer to the preaching of the Jaina and Buddhist monks.He, of course, feels that their discourses on dharma are defective and incomplete because they ignore or criticise faith in Siva.41According to Tirukketaram hymn, even Siva listens to their discourses on dharma and then rewards them.42 Another hymn says that the Jains and Buddhists mix falsehood and truth in their teachings.'Campantar seems to be using a pun when he utilises a sandhi rule to make aravurai into maravurai,44 which is just the opposite of it.The monks of the heretical religions were said to be of pleasing words.'He says that Jaina monks make false penance appear like real penance, as according to Campantar, penance not directed to Siva is false penance."The Jains were well known for their extreme ascetic practices.The Jains and Buddhists had convincing arguments and they looked capable of performing wonderful magical feats."They talked about justice but never reflected on concepts of justice."They who preach about dharma have not read discourses on dharma."Campantar feels that dharma should include faith in Saivism.
What Campantar was trying to do was to woo the Tamilian adherents of the heretical religions50 and to prevent the other Tamils from being converted to those non-Vedic religions.Sometimes, Campantar projects his heart as a separate person and advises it to reject such preaching of the other religionists.51 In a considerable number of places, he appeals to the people to reject or ignore their teachings and to come over for worship in the Saiva shrines."There are also a number of hymns where he says that Siva ignores or disapproves of their teachings."4. Contrasting Jains with Buddhists.
Campantar is very fond of contrasting some of the activities of the Jains and the Buddhists.The Jains and the Buddhists used to describe some Hindu religious practices as superstitious and claimed to be more rationalistic.But they themselves ended up as worshippers of the Botree and the Asoka tree.According to the Jains, Mahavira, their last Tirttankara attained enlightenment under an Asoka tree, and according to the Buddhists, Gautama Buddha attained enlightenment under a Bo- tree.The Jains and the Buddhists pay obeisance to these trees", plant these trees in their places of worship and monasteries and look after the well-being of these trees with the utmost reverence.The worshippers of the Bo-tree are called Potiyar and the worshippers of the Asoka tree are called Pintiyar, from another name of the tree.
Campantar seems to relish portraying the contrasting feature in dress between the Jaina and the Buddhist monks."The Digambara Jaina sect which insists on nudity, discarding all clothing for monks seems to have been the Jaina sect that was popular in Karnataka and Tamilnadu in South India.The Buddhist monks on the other hand were enjoined to robe themselves fully with yellow or saffron coloured cloth.
While the Jaina monks were enjoined to eat standing, the Buddhist monks were enjoined to sit and eat.In three hymns, Campantar has referred to the contrast of the Jaina monks standing and eating and the Buddhist monks sitting and eating."A contrast in another eating habit prescribed for the Jains and the Buddhist monks also is portrayed by Campantar.The Buddhist monks should not eat after noon and the Jain monks should not eat after sunset.So, in the early morning, the Buddhist monks go around collecting alms." The Jain and Buddhist monks are expected to have bald heads without hair but they are enjoined to achieve that state by different means."The Buddhist monks are enjoined to shave their heads while the Jain monks are enjoined to pluck their entire hair from their heads.Campantar has referred to the death agony of the Jaina monks when they undergo the ordeal of plucking their own hair off." A contrast in meals was also noticed by Campantar even though both religions claimed ahimsa or non-killing as their prime virtue.6°The Jain religion extended the principle of ahimsa to embrace vegetarianism and insisted that not only the Jaina clergy but also the Jaina laity should observe strict vegetarianism.Buddhism took the stand that non-vegetarian food can be eaten if the person concerned did not kill.Even Buddhist monks are allowed non-vegetarian food if the monks can be sure that killing was not resorted to with the express purpose of feasting them.
The Saiva saint seems to have had a sense of humour when he was making some references to these heretical religions.The Digambara Jaina monks preaching dharma have been referred to as atai tavirtt-arari kattu-pavarkal 'those who remove their clothes and demonstrate dharma'" and as kurari kattu nal viralir kovanattu kkolovippoy arari kattuñ camanar 'the Jaina monks who have even discarded four inch wide under garment worn by gypsy men and who demonstrate dharma'."The Jaina monks who have given up bathing as an extreme form of asceticism are ridiculed by Campantar as alaiyarum punal turanta aman kuntar 'the nude Jaina 57 TCT: 565.mutiya civarattar mun kuruntekutalum pin kuruntu kati totu camanai Tirukkurumpala 565.
58 TCT: 354.vali talai pari talaiyavarkal .Tiruvamparpperun Tirukkoyil, 354.The Jaina mode of pari talai had been frequently referred to as in, talaiyai pparippar .Tiruppukali.55. paritta pun talai .monks who have renounced water full of waves'."The Brahmins take baths frequently and use water frequently for personal cleanliness and probably this criticism arose from their point of view.In referring to the Buddhist monks, Campantar calls them meyyai pporkkum poyyar," (the liers who cover up the truth) where the word mey has the meaning of `body' as well as 'truth'.
Though Campantar refers to both religions in most of his polemics, there are a few where he refers to one of these religions only.The Tiruppunkur hymn appeals to the heart 'not to listen to mad men who eat alms and who are completely nude, without clothes'."One of the Tiruvilimilalai hymns asks people to answer Campantar who the god of the Jainas was as he could not be located in any of the eight directions."In the same reference, he had described the nude Jaina monks as carrying beautiful peacock feathers and a water pot.The Tiruvilamar hymn appeals to people 'not to have faith in the Jaina temple of those who do not know penance, who carry a water pot and who confuse people playing on words to impress dull-witted people'.67The hymn on Tiruvatikai vIrattanam also seems to refer to the Jains only."The first hymn on Citamparam seems to refer to the Buddhists only when it says, 'without listening to discourse on ignorant fabrication of saffron robed monks who worship idols of human beings'."

References to Ajivakas and Others
Campantar mentions the word kuntar in many places.T. P. Meenaksisundaran discusses its possible significance and arrives at the conclusion 63 TCT: 328.Tiruttalaiccankatu hymn.The Jaina monks refrained from taking baths and washing themselves because they did not want to hurt the minute living beings in water.As a form of penance, some of them used to stand on rocks in very warm sun-light and used to perspire profusely.So, Campantar criticises them often for their dirty, dusty and foul-smelling bodies, as can be seen on 12 that Campantar referred to nude persons by that word (Meenaksisundaranar 1957: 149-160)."So, the latter might be clubbing together both the Jaina and the Ajivaka monks as kuntar.The Ajivakas rejected guna 'characteristic property' as a category of things and so Campantar's references to kunamilikal 'those who reject characteristic property' and kunamilatar 'those who do not accept characteristic property' should denote the Ajivakas.71The Ajivaka monks were not enjoined to observe celibacy and so Campantar's reference to karuvirila ppittar 'mad persons attached to sex' might refer to them."The expression acciyappeykal, which as such does not seem to make sense, should have been a mistake for accivakappeykal `Ajivaka devils'.73As they seem to be the only group of monks, not bound by the oath of celibacy, Campantar might be referring to them when he says, catiyil ninkiya attavattar (monks excluded from their tribe).74

Buddhists Preferred to the Jains
Though Campantar mentions the Jains and the Buddhists together in his polemics, he is generally harsh on the Jains and mild on the Buddhists, as can be seen from the following references: uttai vay ccaman kaiyarkal cakkiyarkkenrum attamaka arivaritayavan `one who is very rarely well-known to the Buddhists and to the base Jains with dirty mouth'75 puttarotu poriyil camanum 'the Buddhists and the senseless Jains'" puttar poy mike camanar 'the Buddhists and the Jains full of lies'" There are very few instances where Campantar had given harsh attributes to the Buddhists enn iranta amanarkalum ili tolil cer cakkiyarum 'numerous Jains and Buddhists with base activities'" uriñcana kuraikal utampinaraki ulitaru camanaruñ cakkiya ppeykal 'the Buddhist devils and wandering Jains with bodies uncovered with cloth' 7 9 There is evidence to conclude that Campantar respected the Buddhists more than the Jains." puttar tattuvamilla ccaman 'the Buddhists and the Jains without philosophy'" puttarkal tattuvar moytt-uri pulkiya kaiyar 'those with hands carrying the swing and the Buddhists who are philosophers having assembled'" tatukk-amaruñ camanarotu tarkka cattirattavar 'the Buddhist logicians and the Jains who sit on a small mat'" For a few centuries preceding Campantar, much work was done on Buddhist philosophy and logic in Andhra Pradesh and Tamilnadu, especially around Kanchi, and Campantar must have been aware of these developments (Veluppillai 1980: 86-116).He seems to have had contempt for the Jainas.
Campantar seems to have had a particular aversion to the anekantavada or the syadvada philosophy of the Jains.Their exposition of syadvada seemed to Campantar as if they were making contradictory statements to confuse and frighten people.
attaku porul untum illaiyum enru ninravarkk-accama ott-ovvamai molintu 'having made positive and negative statements like such a thing exists and exists not'" This type of exposition had been described by Campantar as kavar v a y moli 'ambiguous statement'."Those who make ambiguous statements have been described as kavaruru cintaiyalar 'ambiguous thinkers'."The 78 TCT: 379.Tiruvilimilalai hymn.79 TCT: 644.Tiruvilampaiyankottur hymn. 80Cakkiya nayanar was said to be a Buddhist priest who, without discarding any rules, became a staunch Saivite.He is accepted as one of the Saiva saints.See Cakkiya nayanar Puranam; 18 verses in Cekkilar 1955 (3641-3658 verses).
81 TCT: 311.Tirutturutti hymn.82 TCT: 341.Tiruttarumapuram hymn.83 TCT: 505.Tirukkolili hymn.84 TCT: 524.Tiruvalavay hymn.untu and illai can occur as untilai 'yes-no'.The Tamil word untilai from the verbal base un 'eat' can mean 'not eaten'.So, Campantar uses it as a pun in untilaiyenre ninre tam kaiyil unpor 'those who eat from their hands after having said yes-no'.The second meaning is of the Jain monks receiving and eating more and more alms claiming that they have not yet eaten.Tiruppuravam hymn, 86.context in which the last two expressions occur can be interpreted as covering both the Jains and the Buddhists.But Campantar was specific when he refers to cintai tirukar camanar 'the Jains who confuse the mind' 87 The Jains and the Buddhists depended on arguments and debates for the propagation of their religions."Campantar complains that the Jaina laity and the Buddhist clergy argue till their death to propagate their religions."He has mentioned the name of one of those debating centres as Kavippeyarc cattiram in one of his hymns on Tiruvalavay."So, most probably this centre existed in Maturai.

Critical and Abusive Terms
The heretical religions depended on preaching and Campantar uses the word urai to denote it in a number of places."The expression katturai, which in modern Tamil means an essay, a composition or an article, seems to have been used by Campantar in a loaded sense to mean 'fabricated discourse'.92Quite a number of hymns have this expression katturai to refer to the preachings of the heretical religions.From Campantar's point of view, the Vedas alone were revelations of God Siva about the truth.He had paraphrased katturai as kattiya moli93 and akkiya urai" in other places.As the teachings of the heretical religions owed their existence to their enlightened founders and not to divine revelations, Campantar was running them down.Probably because katturai itself seems to have become stereotyped and does not seem to express what he wanted to communicate, he began to use kattiya katturai.95  91 T C T : 5 , 1 5 9 , 1 9 2 , 2 0 3 .K oy i l , T i r u n i n r i y u r , T i r u n t u t e v a n k u t i a n d T i r u v a l a ñ c u l i hymns.
92 TCT: 2, 54, 199, 288, 290, 300, 391, 472, 572, 665.Koyil, Tiruppukali, Tiruvicayamankai, Tirunakeccuram (2), Tiruvitai marutur, Tiruvilimilalai, Tiruppataliccaram, Tirukkotimataccenkunrur and Tiruvanmiyur hymns.here is a device employed by Tamil to emphasize the point.He uses kattu as an attribute in katt-aman ter" probably to include both religions.The appellative noun form of kattar 'fabricators' seems to have been used for both in one place" and to the Jains only in another place." Campantar uses a considerable number of expressions to denote that the Jains and the Buddhists were not mature enough or intelligent enough to evaluate religions.Here, his attack seems to be two-fold.One set of terms, like atar and atamilli, seems to be just negative, denying them discriminatory wisdom.He has used atamilli in one place only in Tiruvalavay to refer to the Jains in the heat of the confrontation."He has used ear in thirteen places and in eight places out of them he refers to the Jains only.'"Of the other five places, he refers to the Jains in four places but the Tamil word-order gives a chance to interpret that he could be referring to the Buddhists also.'"As for the Buddhists, he uses mutar 'fools' in one place.'"The Buddhists and the Jains are said to be committing pilai `errors'.103Their words are said to be kurra moli 'defective words' and their paths are said to be kurra neri 'defective paths'.The Buddhists are referred to as cotaikal 'not fully developped beings'.105The second set of terms, like petamai 'ignorance' petaiyar107 and petaiyarkara both meaning ignorant persons, refer to the immaturity and inadequate discriminating power of the Jains and the Buddhists.
But he also uses a number of expressions to reject the Jaffna and the Buddhist teachings as lies and absurdities.He uses petiku in one place to denote lies.'"In other places, he uses the common expression poy"' and appellative nouns like poyyar111, poyyarkal112 and poyyavar113, each of them meaning liars.The word poy has been used fifteen times and its plural form of poykal has been used twice.Except in one place in Tirukkolampam hymn where poy refers to the teachings of the Jains, it is used in common to refer to the teachings of both religions in the other sixteen places.Expressions like poy mil 'book of lies' and poyyurai `discourse of lies' are also used to refer to both religions.There is a compound poyttavam 'false penance' which has been used three times.In the Tiruvetkalam hymn, it refers to both religions while in the other two cases, the Jains only are clearly referred to.The phrase poytta van tava vetattar 'those who falsely act as performing extreme penance' also refers to the Jains only.The expression kaitavam, considered to be equivalent to poyttavam, occurs in two places.118While it refers to the Jains only in one place, it refers to both religions in the other place.The appellative noun 'kaittavattar' refers to the Jaina monks only.119 The teachings of these religions have also been dismissed as avam 'useless' 120 and avattam `absurd'." The Saiva saint has used a number of expressions connected with the abstract noun punmai 'baseness'.For example, punmai122 , pun molikal `base words'123 and pun peccu 'base speech' 124 are some of them which refer to the teachings of both religions.There is an expression pun teraramanar 'base Buddhist and Jaina monks'."This clearly refers to the Buddhist monks but the Jaina monks could also have been referred to.But there are a number of expressions like pullaman126 , pun-caman 127 and pun-camanar's where only the Jaina monks are referred to.Closely related in meaning to this set of words, there is the word kaiyar 'base people'.129Campantar uses the expression kaiyil unnum kaiyar 'people eating from their hand' to distinguish the Jaina monks from the Buddhist monks who eat from the alms-bowl.Probably because of the association in form of the two words of kai with different meanings, Campantar has used kaiyar to refer to the Jains only in twenty-one places, while in one place in a Tiruvilimilalai hymn he has used it for both religions.
It is unfortunate that the dark skin of the Jaina monks has been pinpointed in many places.They might have acquired their pigmentation through sun tan by exposing themselves to warm sunlight, as suggested by karukum utalar 'those with sun-burnt bodies'.1"There are expressions like kar niratt-amanar 'dark coloured Jains'131, nilameni amanar `Jains with blue bodies' and kankular amanar `Jaina monks-men of night darkness'.'"Probably as a development from the associations, there is the form karaman 'dark Jains or black Jains'.'"As the Buddhist monks are excluded, it is difficult to believe that Campantar was referring to some labouring classes in South India who may be having darker skin.Some more insulting terms can be noticed in Campantar's polemics.The word peykal 'ghosts or devils' is applied to the Buddhists and maybe to the Aivakas also but not to the Jains.The word kalukkal 'vultures' 136 occurs four times and in three places; it refers to the Jains only but in one place in Tirumaraikkatu hymn, it refers to both religions.The word kalatikal, most probably meaning rebels', refers to the Jains in a Tiruvilimilalai hymn, to the Buddhists in a Tiruvarur hymn and to both in Tiruvomampuliyur hymn.Campantar who has used vetattar 'those 129 TCT : 12, 48, 143, 145, 228, 235, 264, 301, 341, 343, 360, 365, 389, 407, 472, 509, 525, 526, 527, 529, 533, 703.Tiruvilimilalai hymn on 389.who use make up', has shortened that as vetar in two places."'There was already vetar 'hunters' in classical Tamil.So, Campantar might have coined the new word due to his contempt for the Jains.The term nicar13 9 may denote uncultured people and it has been used to denote the Jains in a Tiruppukali hymn and in Tirumarperu hymn.But in the other two instances from Tiruppuravam and Tirumalapati hymns, it refers to both the Jains and the Buddhists.There is a variant form of nitar and it refers to the Buddhists.'"A set of terms associated with mintu 'provoke' such as mintar 'provocateurs', minturai 'provocative discourse' 142 and mintumoli 'provocative language' 143 has been used to refer to the monks of both religions.The word kayavar generally used to denote people lacking in human qualities has been used only once and it refers to the Buddhists.'"The compound, pali taru moliyinar 'those who use insulting language' has been used to denote both religions.'"The compound patu paliyutaiyavar 'those who have acquired big insult' also refers to both.'"The term pulaiyanar, which seems to be connected with pulaiyar, the lowest caste on the social scale, has been applied to both religions."'The monks of both religions are also referred to as kallattar `thieves'.148In a Tiruvalavay hymn, Campantar refers to the Jains as kacivonrilla ccettaikal 'mischievous elements with no kindness'.'"But he uses similar expressions like parivonrilarkal `those who have no kindness"' and urukucintaiy-illar 'those whose minds do not melt' 151 to refer to the Buddhist monks.
The description of pittar 'mad persons'152 had been used to refer to the Jains in Tirukkolampam and Tiruvilimilalai hymns while it had been used to refer to both in Tirukkaruvuranilai and Tiruccopuram hymns Uttering senseless words pitarrutal is mentioned as the action of the former and the latter, respectively.153The word piccar, used to refer to the Buddhist monks, could be either a variant of pittar or a derivative from Sanskrit bhiksu.154The term umar 'dumb persons', referring to the Jain monks, could have denoted those who had taken the vow of silence.'There is a set of terms derived from pavam 'sin' like pavar pavikal `sinners' 157 and mapavikal 'great sinners' 158 Campantar addresses them as pavikal 'oh! sinners' in Tirukkanapper hymn.15'Of these forms, pavar and mapavikal are found in Tiruvalavay hymns and Campantar uses them in anger.The Tiruvalampuram hymn uses pavikal to refer to the Jains while Tiruvettakkuti and Tirukkutavayil hymns uses the same word to refer to both religions.
Campantar uses a number of expressions about the Jains only during the heat of the confrontation in Madurai.They were said to be going about like monkeys and mad elephants."'The word ettar 'those who deceive and steal' had been found in Tiruvalavay and Tirukketiccaram.hymns."'Though the Jains were not known to be very powerful in Ilankai, he had used this word against the Jains only probably because his Madurai experience is still fresh in his memory.In the Tiruvalavay hymns alone, terms like 'inar 'low caste or class of people' 162 , antakar 'blind ekkar 'cruel people'' tennar 'ignorant people' 185 , alippar 'clestroyers' 166 and tuttar 'evil people' "" are found.There are also expressions about the Jains, not always directly connected with the confrontation in Madurai.The compound mottaiyaman 'bald headed Jains' 168 may be related to mottamanar169.The expression murattaman 'Jain ruffians' may be related to mottaman and mottamanar.171I t i s q u i t e p o s s i b l e t h a t m u t t a i ' " and muttaikar" also refer to bald-headedness.
In the religious confrontation in Campantar's time, the Jains and the Buddhists were attacking the Saivites.It is interesting to see how the Saiva saint was viewing these attacks.One of the expressions of Campantar is to call the attack alar turra 'to scandalize'.'"He also uses puran kira 'to back-bite or to slander' in many places.'75There is another expression puranurai used both as a noun and as an infinitive.'"It is equivalent to purafikuratal or to making meaningless utterance.
Even among religions that have accepted ahimsa or non-killing as their first precept, the Jains claim that they are the staunchest defenders of that principle, carrying their behavior to what normal human beings regard as an absurd extent.But in defence of their religion, they have exhibited violent behavior.Periapuranam details a number of instances.So, Campantar refers to the Jains as van camanar 'violent Jains'.1"The compound vallaman should be considered just as a variant."'There is an expression vañcamanar which could mean 'deceptive Jains'.'"There is also another compound van talai pari kkaiyar where violence could also refer to plucking hair from their heads.'"8. Some Specific Criticisms It is important to note which important aspects of Jainism and Buddhism Campantar was specially objecting to.As for Buddhism, the following reference is important: kunam arivukal nilaiyila porulurai maruviya porulkalumila tinam enum avar 'Quality and knowledge are impermanent.Even things spoken of as having substance disappear.They who say that this is definite'.' This is what is called Ksanikavada of the Buddhists.From this stand point, T. P. Meenaksisundaran has been able to suggest better readings or modifications to two expressions found as kanicer nompu'" and kanikai nonpar'" in contexts which suggest that they must have been referring to the Buddhists.The importance of this principle in Buddhism and Campantar's objection to it also becomes clear in the verses dealing with Campantar's disputation with the Buddhists at Potimankai.184This principle was propounded and rejected in that section.
There was also a common criticism against the Jains and a Buddhist sect.Like the Jains, the Vaibasika sect of Buddhism preferred to trace the beginnings of the world to atoms parama anukkal, unlike the Hindus who postulated mayai.Campantar criticises them as arampar 'those who begin with atoms'.'"The Tamil expression can also refer to those at the primary stage.In his Tiruvannamalai hymn, Campantar applies this designation to both the Jains and the Buddhists and appeals to the people of the world not to listen to their discourses.
In his Tirukkutantai kkaronam hymn, Campantar refers to the Jains as kurattikal penar 'they do not respect nuns'.186 What is being referred to here seems to be the negative attitude of the Digambara Jaina sect to women.Nuns have to be reborn as men in their next life and become monks to attain salvation.

Four Tiruvalavay Hymns
As already noted, every verse of four hymns on Tiruvalavay deals with polemics against the Jains.An impression can be easily formed from a study of these hymns on what Campantar was blaming on the Jains, on what he was defending against the Jains and how he was trying to deal with them.According to Campantar, the Jaina monks were living in places, beginning from Anaimamalai 'Elephant rock'.187 Cekkilar refers to them as en perun kunratt-enna yiravar 'eight thousand monks from eight hills'.
He also criticises them for some of their literary efforts and mentions Kili viruttam 'The story of the parrot' and Elippattu 'The story of the rat'.188These works are not extant.Their content must have been something comparable to Nari viruttam 'The story of the fox' of the well known Tiruttakkatevar, the author of the Jaina epic of Civakacintamani (Tiruttakkatevar 1949: 24).These stories were generally expected to illustrate the impermanence of worldly pleasures.Campantar seems to refer to this method of Jaina preaching, which mentions nakuvana caritaikal ceytulalvar 'they wander narrating humorous stories' in his Tirutturutti -Tiruvelvikkuti hymn.189 There is a reference to the Jains as being satirical to poets, the exact significance of which is not clear.pulavarkalai ppalikkum arikatarkkeliyenalen 'I am not scared of satirists who run-down poets'.190In Tamil, the word pulavar 'poet' is used in a wide sense.Here, Campantar could not be referring to authors of ethical works as poets as there were many Jaina authors among them.The poets could have been Carikam-poets and the later poets following that tradition.
Religious difference seems to have led to a deep social cleavage in Tamilnadu.nirru meniyarayinar mel urra karru kollavu nilla amanar 'the Jaina monks who do not wait even to feel the air that touched the body of those with sacred ashes'.191According to Cekkilar, the Jains had begun to use terms like kantu muttu 'pain after having seen' and kettu muttu 'pain after having heard' in their reference to the Saivites (Cekkilar 1955: 338-339).192 So Campantar seems to feel that Tamil society has to be saved from adherents of such a religion.
It is quite possible that Campantar's feelings towards the Jains could have reached the stage of hatred when the Jaina monks set fire to the Madurai mutt where he was staying with other Saiva devotees.There is one entire hymn in every verse of which he appeals to Siva for protection and in every verse of which he expresses his wish that the flame lit by the Jains should go as high fever to the Pandya king who gave permission to the Jains to commit this outrage and sacrilege (Cekkilar 1955: 340-341).193He uses many abusive and offensive epithets to refer to the Jaina monks and this is understandable in the context.In every verse of this hymn, he appeals to Siva, using añcal enr-arul cey-enai 'please grace me by saying 'do not be scared' or its shortened forms.'"There are also two Tiruvalavay hymns which are in the form of Campantar seeking permission from Siva for disputation with the Jaina monks.'95The differences in the structure of the two relevant hymns is worthy of note.
The first hymn starts with kqtumavatu.The first verse gives the impression of Campantar talking to Siva, urai ceyvanan 'I appeal to you'.There are two references, critical of the Jains for not studying the Vedas and for not performing Vedic sacrifices."'There is another reference in the ninth verse complaining that they do not know the higher stage of heaven.Campantar believed that only those who were devoted to Siva attained salvation and heaven.The third verse of this hymn has led to some controversy recently as there is an infinitive karpalikka 'to rape' and in the line above there is a reference to Buddhist monks covering their whole body like women.In the relevant portion, it only seems to imply the breaking or the destruction of the firm attachment of the Jains and the Buddhists to their own religions (Veluppillai 1980: 117-150).
The other hymn, beginning with veta velviyai, seems to have been artfully composed.That Campantar was trying to defend Vedic Saivism against the Jains and the Buddhists becomes very clear from this hymn Each of the ten verses tells Siva, ñalam nin pukale mikaventum 'Your fame should become predominant in the world'.What had been mentioned in two verses regarding the Vedic tradition in the earlier hymn had been expanded into seven references in the first seven verses of the hymn.The first line of this hymn itself starts seeking iva's permission to defeat the Jains who condemn Vedic sacrifices.The same strain, condemning the Jains for not accepting the Vedic tradition as nonsense and seeking iva's permission has been repeated again in the following six verses and here it is clear defence of Brahmanism.197In verses nine and ten, Campantar was substituting references to the Jains who do not worship the sacred feet of Siva and who do not understand the glories of Siva.The first two verses of the hymn mention the Buddhists also along with the Jains.198 The twenty verses in these two hymns appeal to Siva to make known to Campantar what He has in His Mind about debating with the Jains.The first hymn itself starts with otti vatu ceyya tiruvullame inquiring whether Siva's mind was agreeable to Campantar getting closer to the Jains and debating with them.The second verse in the second hymn repeats the same question, with only a change in the first word to eyti but with no change in meaning.The mention of the word, vittu 'debate' occurs also in the fourth, the fifth, the sixth, the seventh, the eighth and the ninth verses of the first hymn and in all the verses of the second hymn.His anger with the Jains becomes clear where he expresses his wish to crri and ceruttu, both meaning, with rage, to confront them in debate.He wants to defeat them only, as seen in expressions like rnitil venr-alikka 'to win and destroy in debate' and vatinil centatitt-ulara implying smashing victory in debate.He wanted to win a complete victory in debate, as seen in muriya vatu ceyat tiruvullame.He wanted to establishSiva's glories among the Jains, as mentioned in amanar tirattu nin arm vatu ceya.Campantar wanted to proceed slowly and convince the Jains of the merits of aivism.'"

Three Miracles
It is very unfortunate that even though Campantar's hymns promise so much in a fair debate, nothing about the actual debate has been preserved for posterity.Neither Nampi Antar Nampi nor Cekkilar nor later authors seem to have come across any tradition about the arguments of the debate.The validity of Saivism versus Jainism seems to have been decided in three tests where Campantar was able to clinch the issue by performing three miracles.The first test was curing the king's high fever.The Jains could not cure him.The Saiva saint was using the sacred ashes from Tiruvalavay temple as medicine: So an entire hymn was composed on praises of the sacred ashes of the temple.'The eleventh verse mentions clearly the context in which the hymn was composed.
The second miracle was a sort of fire ordeal in which the Saivites and the Jains were to set some of their religious documents on fire and the document of the true religion was not expected to burn.According to Cekkilar, this test was suggested by the Jains themselves (Cekkilar 1955: 348).201The Jaina monks wrote a manuscript and set it on fire.It was completely burnt.Campantar took out a random sample from his hymns and the Tirunallaru hymn came out.Just before setting that manuscript into the fire, Campantar composed another hymn on the same shrine where he mentions the context of its composition in all the verses and says that the manuscript would not be destroyed.Because the hymn has the name of Siva of Tirunallaru, it could not suffer destruction -a refrain found in each verse of that hymn.
The third test was a sort of water ordeal in which the manuscript of true religion was expected to swim against the current and to reach the other bank of the Vaiyai river.The Jaina monks took the initiative as they wanted to offset the losses they had already suffered twice.The Jains had ash nasti 'yes-no', a basic principle of their Syadvada philosophy, written in a manuscript and they put in the river (Cekkilar 1955: 352).202This went with the current to the sea and so this could not be traced.Campantar composed a special hymn called Tiruppacuram of twelve verses.203 This hymn, beginning with valka antanar vanavar aninam 'Long live the Brahmins, the Devas and the cows' is generally hailed as consisting of the essence of Tamil Saivism.
According to Cekkitar, Campantar went through a reluctant wedding ceremony at the request of his parents and relatives and immediately afterwards, Siva sent a sacred fire to Tirunallarpperumanam. At the bidding of Campantar, all those who came for the wedding entered the sacred fire.Campantar composed a hymn204 and then entered the fire with his newly wedded wife.Putting this incident into the perspective of Campantar's hostile references to the Jains and the Buddhists, the burning of the Saiva mutt in Madurai by the Jains and the allegation of Campantar's involvement in the impalement of the Jains, some people now try to interpret the end of Campantar's life in this world as caused by arson by followers of these heretical religions.As there is no evidence for such an interpretation, one can only depend on the last hymn of Campantar.Campantar seems to be his usual self even in that hymn.There is nothing in that hymn to suggest that the Saiva Saint was suspecting any conspiracy from the Jains or the Buddhists.

Conclusion
The primary source of Campantar's devotional hymns as well as the secondary source of Periyapuranam clearly establish the fact that Campantar's outbursts against the Jains and the Buddhists were one of the underlying themes throughout his career.Some other Saiva saints and Vaisnava saints also have some polemical references mainly against the Jains.The Jains were probably a greater threat to Hinduism than Buddhism.Campantar also seems to have disliked the Jains more than the Buddhists though he seems to have taken particular care to club them together with the Jains and others in many places.He seems to have started his career with a definite plan to establish Saivism in Tamilnadu.The structure of his patikam or hymn had an unchanged outline from his first hymn to his last hymn.
He was actually defending a synthetic form of Hinduism which could be described as Tamil Vedic Pauranic Saivism.Regarding the parallel development of Tamil Vaisnavism, even during the period of the first four Alvars, Friedhelm Hardy has the following observation, "However, although writing at the very fringe of Tamilnadu, the first four Alvars are deeply Tamil, not only in their language, in their poetic style, in their mythological repertoire and in their geographical references, but most pronouncedly in their emotional or sensuous worship of the temple vigraha, in which we can recognise the ancient anthropocentricity of the Tamils" (Hardy 1983: 308).Campantar is equally Tamil in his Saivism.He seems to be very concious that he was only defending the Tamil religion.He seems to have made admirable use of Tamil nationalism in his confrontation with Jainism and Buddhism.It was probably the most important factor that favoured the success of the Saiva bhakti movement.
Campantar was very proud of his caste and gotra identities.He was able to bring out a synthesis of the interests of his caste along with those of Saivism.The authority of Vedas and the dominance of the Brahmins seem to be essential ingredients of Saivism, propagated by Campantar.attributes and glories were heavily dependent on Pauranic themes.Those Pauranic or mythological stories were said to have taken place mostly in different parts of Tamilnadu.
The Saiva saint might have owed his success in establishing Tamil Saivism to his portrayal of the synthetic Saivism in association with Tamil nationalism.The Jains and the Buddhists could not withstand the movement launched by Campantar.Islam and Christianity came to Tamilnadu later but still the main stream among the Tamils continues to be Saivite.In the present century, there is a deep cleavage between Brahmin dominance and Tamil nationalism and it remains to be seen how much of Saivism can be salvaged.
as a compound of kalu and kaiyar occurs in a general hymn on 700.Here kalu seems to stand for kaluku of later Tamil.This is the only sense in which Campantar had used this word.It is not known whether this word denoted stake in Campantar's time.