Materiality, Movement and Meaning: Architecture and the Embodied Mind.


  • Jonathan Hale


To be human – and therefore to be embodied – is to be already extended into the world, into what Maurice Merleau-Ponty in his last writings called the ‘flesh’ of the world: a liminal realm where it is impossible to say categorically what belongs to the self and what belongs to the environment. This talk develops a new theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between
architecture and embodiment – initially, by questioning the now commonplace view of the body’s prosthetic relationship with technology. Drawing on the work of contemporary thinkers such as Bernard Stiegler, Raymond Tallis, and Tim Ingold, it argues that rather than treating new technological extensions of the body as in some way threatening to our sense of self, we should instead see them in a more positive way as part of a longer developmental trajectory in which ‘the human’ and ‘the technological’ are in fact mutually co-constitutive. By considering these issues within the framework of recent advances in evolutionary, cognitive and neuroscientific theory, the paper tries  to draw out some of the more significant implications of both human and technological embodiment for designing, making and thinking about architecture today.




How to Cite

Hale, J. (2014). Materiality, Movement and Meaning: Architecture and the Embodied Mind. Proceedings of the Annual Architectural Research Symposium in Finland, 3. Retrieved from