It can spill out on to the street

Revitalization potential of an adaptive reuse project

Authors

• Rebecka Lundgren Lund University
• Riikka Kyrö Lund University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30672/njsr.130058

Keywords:

adaptive reuse, social sustainability, shared spaces, refurbishment, revitalization

Abstract

The revitalization of existing neighborhoods has been a frequent topic of public and academic debate in post–industrial times. Yet, little is known about the potential of individual, commercial real estate development projects to revitalize neighborhoods. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings, especially when combined with collaborative spaces, have been linked to positive social impacts beyond cultural heritage, such as aesthetic experience, and social inclusion. This study utilizes a social lifecycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to evaluate the social impact of an adaptive reuse project. The focus is on the revitalization potential on the respective neighborhood. The case neighborhood is Möllevången, located in Malmö, Sweden. The neighborhood and city both suffer from socioeconomic challenges, such as high unemployment rates, drug abuse, and vandalism. A building within the neighborhood has been refurbished for offices and workshops for the creative industries, as well as spaces open to the public and local community. Significant revitalization potential on the neighborhood was identified, predominantly through the categories of community development and engagement, cultural heritage, local employment, and neighborhood characteristics. The findings are useful to real estate owners and developers wanting to increase neighborhood vitality through real estate development projects, as well as researchers interested in ways to assess the social impact in development projects. The study identifies aspects where a real estate project can function as a tool to revitalize existing neighborhoods.

References

Armitage, L., & Irons, J. (2013). The Values of Built Heritage. Property Management,

(3), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471311321487.

Atkinson, R. (2003). Introduction: Misunderstood Saviour on Vengeful Wrecker? The

Many Meanings and Problems of Gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2343–2350.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136093.

Atkinson, R. (2004). The Evidence on the Impact of Gentrification: New Lessons for the

Urban Renaissance. European Journal of Housing Policy, 4(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/

1080/1461671042000215479.

BID Malmö. (2023). Tillsammans utvecklar vi Möllevången till en attraktiv del av Malmö.

https://bidmalmo.se/mollan-tillsammans-utvecklar-vi-sofielund-till-en-attraktiv-del-avmalmo/.

Chan, A., Cheung, E., & Wong, I. (2015). Impacts of the Revitalizing Industrial Buildings

(RIB) Scheme in Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 184–190. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.08.005.

Ciesiółka, P., Gunko, M., & Pivovar, G. (2020). Who Defines Urban Regeneration?

Comparative Analysis of Medium-Sized Cities in Poland and Russia. Geographia

Polonica, 93(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0172.

Conejos, S., Langston, C., & Smith, J. (2015). Enhancing Sustainability through

Designing for Adaptive Reuse from the Outset: A Comparison of AdaptSTAR and

Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) models. Facilities, 33(9–10), 531–552. https://doi.

org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0011.

Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New Build ‘Gentrification’ and London’s Riverside

Renaissance. Environment and Planning, 37, 1165–1190.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative

Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.

Foster, G. (2020). Circular Economy Strategies for Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage

Buildings to Reduce Environmental Impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507.

Fufa, S. M., Flyen, C., & Flyen, A. C. (2021). How Can Existing Buildings with Historic

Values Contribute to Achieving Emission Reduction Ambitions? In Applied Sciences

(Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 13). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135978.

Glow, H., Johanson, K., & Kershaw, A. (2014). More Yuppy Stuff Coming Soon:

Gentrification, Cultural Policy, Social Inclusion and the Arts. Continuum, 28(4), 495–508.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.907870.

Goel, A., Ganesh, L. S., & Kaur, A. (2020). Social Sustainability Considerations in

Construction Project Feasibility Study: A Stakeholder Salience Perspective. Engineering,

Construction and Architectural Management, 27(7), 1429–1459. https://doi.org/10.1108/

ECAM-06-2019-0319.

Granger, R. (2010). What Now for Urban Regeneration? Proceedings of the Institution of

Civil Engineers -- Urban Design and Planning, 163(1).

Hansen, C. (2019). Solidarity In Diversity. Activism as a Pathway of Migrant Emplacement

in Malmö.

Ibrahim, F., & Abdul Ghani, S. S. (2018). Socio-Economic Impact of Revitalization: The

Case of Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Regional

Development, 5(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijrd.v5i2.13024.

Jamal, A. C. (2018). Coworking Spaces in Mid-Sized Cities: A Partner in Downtown

Economic Development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(4), 773–

https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18760857.

Karji, A., Woldesenbet, A., Khanzadi, M., & Tafazzoli, M. (2019). Assessment of Social

Sustainability Indicators in Mass Housing Construction: A Case Study of Mehr Housing

Project. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101697.

Kiroff, L. (2020). Nexus Between Creative Industries and the Built Environment: Creative

Placemaking in Inner Auckland. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1), 119–137.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.08.004.

Kronkvist, K., & Ivert, A. K. (2020). A Winning BID? The Effects of a BID-Inspired

Property Owner Collaboration on Neighbourhood Crime Rates in Malmö, Sweden. Crime

Prevention and Community Safety, 22(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-020-

-5.

Kyrö, R., & Lundgren, R. (2022). Your Vibe Attracts Your Tribe -- The Adaptive Reuse

of Buildings Delivering Aesthetic Experience and Social Inclusion. IOP Conference

Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-

/1101/6/062014.

Langston, C. (2008). The Sustainability Implications of Building Adaptive Reuse. Chinese

Research Institute of Construction Management (CRIOCM) International Symposium,

Beijing , China. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/sustainable_development/4.

Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?

Urban Studies, 45(12), 2449–2470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097099.

Liu, S., & Qian, S. (2019). Evaluation of Social Life-Cycle Performance of Buildings:

Theoretical Framework and Impact Assessment Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production,

, 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.200.

Lundgren, R. (2023). Social Lifecycle Assessment of Adaptive Reuse. Buildings and

Cities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.314.

Lundgren, R., Kyrö, R., & Jylhä, T. (2022). Access-Based Consumption in the Built

Environment: Sharing Spaces. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/

su14095550.

Meijer, M., & Syssner, J. (2017). Getting Ahead in Depopulating Areas -- How Linking Social Capital Is Used for Informal Planning Practices in Sweden and The Netherlands.

Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.014.

Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the Social Dimension of the Circular Economy.

In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 321). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jclepro.2021.128960.

Orel, M., & Alonso Almeida, M. del M. (2019). The Ambience of Collaboration in

Coworking Environments. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 21(4), 273–289. https://doi.

org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0050.

Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the Social

Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. In Sustainability

(Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 19). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12197912.

Pallares-Barbera, M., Dot, E., & Casellas, A. (2012). Artists, Cultural Gentrification and

Public Policy. Urbani Izziv, 23(1), 104–114.

Rahbarianyazd, R. (2017). Sustainability in Historic Urban Environments: Effect of

Gentrification in the Process of Sustainable Urban Revitalization. Contemporary Urban

Affairs, 1(1), 1–9.

UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations.

UNEP. (2021). Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment

(S-LCA).

Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment

and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491.

Vehbi, B. O., & Hoskara, Ş. Ö. (2009). A Model for Measuring the Sustainability Level

of Historic Urban Quarters. European Planning Studies, 17(5), 715–739. https://doi.

org/10.1080/09654310902778201.

Wadu Mesthrige, J., Wong, J. K. W., & Yuk, L. N. (2018). Conversion or Redevelopment?

Effects of Revitalization of Old Industrial Buildings on Property Values. Habitat

International, 73, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.12.005.

Walker, A. M., Opferkuch, K., Roos Lindgreen, E., Simboli, A., Vermeulen, W. J. V., &

Raggi, A. (2021). Assessing the Social Sustainability of Circular Economy Practices:

Industry Perspectives from Italy and the Netherlands. Sustainable Production and

Consumption, 27, 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.030.

Waters-Lynch, J., & Potts, J. (2017). The Social Economy of Coworking Spaces: A Focal

Point Model of Coordination. Review of Social Economy, 75(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/

1080/00346764.2016.1269938.

Yung, H. K. E., & Chan, H. W. E. (2012). Critical Social Sustainability Factors in Urban

Conservation: The Case of the Central Police Station Compound in Hong Kong. Facilities,

(9), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211235224.