Cooperation Between Public Organizations in the Implementation of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI)s

A Case Study from Sweden

Authors

• Olov Olsson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30672/njsr.65571

Abstract

Questions concerning cooperation are particularly relevant in complex projects where people from many organizations are involved and work together. There is a need to study and evaluate how better knowledge about cooperation can improve and make future projects more efficient. This case study is part of a research project aiming at evaluating the importance of abilities related to cooperation in the implementation of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) projects. The problem at hand is that, many complex projects engage key personnel on different levels with limited experience on how to deal with questions of cooperation – both in planning and practical work. The aim of the study is to evaluate problems in cooperation using established theories and knowledge on cooperation, as well as to analyse whether problems of cooperation related to implementation specifically were a bottleneck in the studied project. Data capture is mainly based on open ended interviews. The study utilizes a framework including theories of cooperation and a model “talk – decision – action” (Brunsson, 2006). The results pointed towards problems in especially the action category. There was a lack of reciprocity between the cooperating parties, a lack of awareness about the need of daily cooperative behaviour in implementation activities and a potential risk of a free-rider problem. The most important lesson from the study is that, cooperation is a crucial component in a project of this kind, and that needed cooperation in practical implementation activities should be paid a lot of attention also in early planning activities.

References

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, Inc, New York, N Y., USA.

Axelrod, R. (2000) On six Advances in Cooperation Theory. School of Public Policy,

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109, USA. Prepared for a special Issue of

Analyse & Kritik on the Evolution of cooperation.

Brunsson, N. (2006) The organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decision and Action in

organizations. Copenhagen business School press, Denmark.

Buckley, PJ., Casson M (2010) A theory of cooperation in international business. The

Multinational Enterprise Revisited (pp 41–67). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.

org/10.1057/9780230250468_3.

Creswell, J W (2015) A concise introduction to Mixed methods Research. Department of

Family medicine, University of Michigan, USA. Sage Publications, ISBN: 9781483359045.

De Waal, FBM., Davis JM. (2003) Capuchin cognitive ecology: cooperation based

on projected returns – Neuropsychologia, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-

(02)00152-5.

Flick, U. (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Edition 4. Sage Publications,

USA.

Fredholm, A. (editor) (1978) Lantmäteriet och kartväsendet i samhällsbyggande 1928–

Gävle, Sweden 1978.

Jones, GR., George, JM (1998) The experience and evolution of trust : implications for

cooperation and teamwork – Strategic management journal, 1998 – JSTOR. https://doi.

org/10.2307/259293.

Koerten, H. (2006) Assessing organizational aspects of SDI. Delft University of Technology,

Delft, Netherlands.

Kollock, P (1998) Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation – Annual review of

sociology, 1998 – JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183.

Nationell geodatastrategi (2016), Sverige bygger en infrastruktur för geodata.

Geodatasamverkan – www.geodata.se.

Olsson, O. (2002) User Interface 2000 – new standard for the cadastral index map of

Sweden. FIG. (International federation of surveyors) XXII International Congress,

Washington D.C. USA. April 19–26 2002.

Olsson, O., Papadoupoulos, C. (2006) Employment of the User Interface 2000 for the

development of the New Cadastral Index Map of Sweden – Some Experiences. FIG

(International federation of surveyors) Regional Conference. Accra, Ghana, March 8–11,

Olsson, O. (2009) Cooperation – a key factor for sustainable spatial data infrastructure

(SDI). SDI Convergence research, emerging trends and critical Assessment. Netherlands

Geodetic commission, 48, 2009.

O´Neill, K., Balsiger,J., Vandeveer, SD (2004) Actors, norms and impact: recent international

cooperation theory and the influence of the agent – structure debate – Annu,Rev.Polit.

Sci,2004- annual reviews.org. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.090803.161821.

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective

action. Cambridge University press, USA https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763.

Målbild 2000 (2000) Project report – a new national digital cadastral index map and a

new technical interface for data exchange. Lantmäteriet and Svenska kommunförbundet.

Sweden 2000.

Price, M. E., Johnson D. P (2011) The Adaptationist Theory of Cooperation in Groups:

Evolutionary Predictions for Organizational Cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology

in Business Sciences. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011, Germany. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6_5.

SOU 1969:43 (1969) Nytt lantmäteri, statens offentliga utredningar (national investigation

and proposal concerning a new organization for surveying). Sweden 1969.

Thellufsen, C. (2008) Awareness – a tool for investigating interorganizational collaboration

in land administration systems? (PhD) Aalborg University, Denmark.

Wilson, DS., O´Brian, DT (2009) Evolutionary theory and cooperation in everyday life.

From book: Games, groups and the global good (pp 155–168). Springer. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_9.

Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study research – design and methods. Sage Publications Inc.,

U.S.A.