Inclusionary housing policies in Gothenburg, Sweden, and Stuttgart, Germany

The importance of norms and institutions

Authors

• Anna Granath Hansson KTH Royal Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30672/njsr.75140

Keywords:

affordable housing, inclusionary housing, housing policy, municipal land, housing systems

Abstract

Affordable housing shortage and concerns about social and income segregation have become a focal point of housing policy debate in many Western countries, and inclusionary housing policies (IH) have become widespread. IH is a term that summarizes municipal ambitions to spur the inclusion of affordable housing in otherwise market-rate projects through development restrictions. This article investigates IH policy objectives and outcomes of policies applied by the German city of Stuttgart and a Swedish pilot project in the city of Gothenburg.

Although IH policies in the two countries generally have very similar objectives and incentive structures, underlying slow-moving institutions decide fundamental traits of the fast-moving institution of IH. In the Swedish case, allocation methods of low-rent apartments under the unitary housing system might prevent targeted polices such as IH from functioning as intended. In the German case, IH is integrated into the existing social and affordable housing system. Therefore its social objectives are not contested, although the limitation of private property rights and the incentive structures of developers are bound to be discussed.

Irrespective of the housing system, the extent of public land ownership might also be a decisive factor in whether to implement IH policies or not. In Stuttgart, where public land ownership is limited, IH policies might be an effective way to produce affordable housing, as alternatives, including finding inexpensive land for public production, are limited. As Gothenburg municipality owns most of the land available for housing development, has a planning monopoly and public housing companies with good financial standing, it might find other, quicker and possibly less costly, ways to develop affordable housing than applying IH, especially if it is implemented mainly through public investors.

References

Bolt, G., Özüekren S. & Philips, D. (2010). Linking integration and residential segregation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), 169-186

Boplats (2015). Marknadsanalys: undersökning för ÄlvstrandenUtveckling AB. (Market analysis: analysis made on behalf of Älvstranden Development Ltd). Boplats Göteborg AB: Göteborg

Caesar, C. (2016). Municipal land ownership and housing in Sweden. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Calavita, N., Grimes, K. & Mallach, A. (1997). Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 109-142
Calavita, N. & Mallach, A. (2009). Inclusionary housing, incentives and land value recapture. Land Lines, 21, 15-21
Calavita, N. & Mallach, A. (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. (Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy)
Danell, J. & Olausson, M. (2016). Affordable housing through inclusionary zoning: The case of Frihamnen, Gothenburg. Master thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
de Kam, G., Needham, B. & Buitelaar, E. (2014). The embeddedness of inclusionary housing in planning and housing systems: Insights from an international comparison. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29, 389-402

Deschermeier, P., Haas, H., Hude, M. & Voigtländer, M. (2016). A first analysis of the new German rent regulation. International Journal of Housing Policy. DOI 10.1080/14616718.2015.1135858

Drever, A. I. (2004). Separate spaces, separate outcomes? Neighbourhood impacts on minorities in Germany. Urban Studies, 41(8), 1423-1439

Drixler, E., Friesecke, F., Kötter, T., Weitkamp, A. & Weiβ, D. (2014). Kommunale Bodenpolitik und Baulandmodellle- Strategien für bezahlbaren Wohnraum? Eine vergleichende Analyse in deutschen Städten. DVW Band 76/2014

Droste, C. & Knorr-Siedow, T. (2014). Social Housing in Germany. (In Scanlon, K., Whitehead, C. & Fernández Arrigoitia, M. (Eds.), Social housing in Europe (pp. 183-204). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell)
Framtiden (2017). Årsredovisning 2016 (Annual Report 2016). Göteborg: Förvaltnings AB Framtiden

Friesecke, F. (2015). Land policy models and strategies in the Federal Republic of Germany. (In E. Hepperle, R. Dixon-Gough, R. Mansberger, J. Paulsson, R. Reuter, & M. Yilmaz (Eds.), Challenges for governance structures in urban and regional development (pp. 125-138). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich)

Galster, G. (2007a). Should policy makers strive for neighborhood social mix? An analysis of the Western European evidence base. Housing Studies, 22(4), 523-545

Galster, G. (2007b). Neighborhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. International Journal of Housing Policy, 7(1), 19-43

Gibb, K. (2011). Delivering new affordable housing in the age of austerity: Housing policy in Scotland. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 4(4), 357-368
GP (2015). Låga hyror i Frihamnen bara ett steg på vägen (Low rents in Frihamnen only a step on the way). Göteborgsposten, March 10, 2015
Grundström, K. & Molina, I. (2016). From Folkhem to lifestyle housing in Sweden: Segregation and urban form, 1930s-2010s. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(3), 316-336

Gurran, N. & Whitehead, C. (2011). Planning and affordable housing in Australia and the UK: A comparative perspective. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 1193-1214

Göteborg (2014). Bostadsförsörjning i Göteborg (Housing provision in Gothenburg). Göteborg: City of Göteborg

Hughen, W. K. & Read, D. C. (2014). Inclusionary housing policies: Stigma effects and strategic production decisions. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economy, 48(4), 589-610

Immobilienzeitung (2017). Erpresste Sozialquote (Social share blackmail), 22/2017

Kemeny, J. (1995). From public housing to the social market: Rented policy strategies in comparative perspective. (London: Routledge)

Kontokosta, C. E. (2014). Do inclusionary zoning policies equitably disperse affordable housing? A comparative spatial analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(4), 569-590

Lind, H. (2014). Social Housing in Sweden. (In Scanlon, K., Whitehead, C. & Fernández Arrigoitia, M. (Eds.), Social housing in Europe (pp. 91-102). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell)
Marom, N. & Carmon, N. (2015). Affordable housing plans in London and New York: Between marketplace and social mix. Housing Studies, 30(7), 993-1015

Monk, S. (2010). England: Affordable housing through the planning system: The role of Section 106. (In N. Calavita & A. Mallach (Eds.), Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. (pp. 123-168) Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.)
Mukhija, V., Regus, L., Slovin, S. & Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229-252

Mulliner, E. & Maliene, V. (2013). Austerity and reform to affordable housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 397-407

Musterd, S. & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 761-790

Pickvance, C. (2001) Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Bult Environment, 16:7-28.

Roland, G. (2004). Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 109-131
Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R. & Been, V. (2009). 31 Flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC and suburban Boston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), 441-456

Skifter Andersen, H., Andersson, R., Wessel, T. & Vilkama, K. (2016). The impact of housing policies and housing markets on ethnic spatial segregation: Comparing the capital cities of four Nordic welfare states. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1), 1-30
Stephens, M. 2017. Housing regimes 20 years after Kemeny. Working paper. Edinburgh: The Urban Institute, Heriot-Watt University.
Stuttgart (2013a). Wohnen in Stuttgart (Housing in Stuttgart). Retrieved from http://www.stuttgart.de/img/mdb/item/524289/99739.pdf
Stuttgart (2013b). Perspektiven und baulandpolitische Grundsätze für eine sozial ausgewogene und qualitätsorientierte Stadtentwicklung. (Perspectives and land policy principles for a socially sustainable and quality oriented city development). Retrieved from http://www.stuttgart.de/img/mdb/item/428459/96531.pdf
Stuttgart (2015). Konditionen des Stuttgarter Innenentwicklungsmodells (SIM) (Conditions of the Stuttgart inner development program (SIM)). Retrieved from http://www.stuttgart.de/img/mdb/item/428459/79133.pdf
Stuttgart (2017). Erneut hohe Wohnungsbautätigkeit in Stuttgart (Again large housing construction in Stuttgart). Retrieved from http://www.stuttgart.de/item/show/273273/1/9/629647?

SWSG (2016). Wohnungsunternehmen beantragt Förderung für 217 Sozialwohnungen und stellt 415 Neubaueinheiten fertig (Housing company applies for subsidy of 217 social housing units and completes 415 new housing units). Retrieved from https://www.swsg.de/aktuelles/news/swsg-geht-voran-beim-bezahlbaren-wohnungsbau-in-stuttgart.html
SWSG (2017). SWSG schafft für Stuttgart mehr, neue und preiswerte Wohnungen (SWSG builds more new and affordable housing for Stuttgart). Retrieved from https://www.swsg.de/aktuelles/news/swsg-schafft-fuer-stuttgart-mehr-neue-und-preiswerte-wohnungen.html.
van Ham, M., Tammaru, T., de Vuijust, E. & Zwiers, M. (2016). Spatial segregation and socio-economic mobility in European cities. Bonn: IZA Institute for the Study of Labor

Weitkamp, A., Klein, I. and Friesecke, F. (2017). Strategies of developing building land in growing cities. In: Hepperle, E., Dixon-Gough, R. Mansberger, R., Paulsson, J., Hernik, J. & Kalbro, T (Eds.), The integration of past, present, and future in spatial planning and land management policies (pp. 327-340). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich.

Whitehead, C. (2007). Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study? Housing Studies, 22(1), 25-44
Winston, N. (2017). Multifamily housing and resident life satisfaction in Europe: an exploratory analysis. Housing Studies, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2017.1280776

Yin, R.K. (2006). Fallstudier: design och genomförande (Case study research). Stockholm: Liber.

Author (2015).

Author (2017a).

Author (2017b).