Top
Nordic Yearbook of Population Research

Why fertility has been declining in Finland after the Global Recession?
A theoretical approach

Authors

Heikki Hiilamo

DOI

https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.85090

Files

View PDF

Abstract

A steady improvement in the economy and employment since 2010 did not stop the drop in total fertility rate in Finland. Declining fertility now includes women in almost all age and educational groups in the country. This decline has continued long enough to also indicate a dramatic decrease in completed fertility, which is a departure from decades of sustained levels of completed fertility. Drawing from a range of publicly available descriptive data, this article assesses the extent to which old and new theories of fertility are relevant in explaining this development. In conclusion, the fertility development in Finland is surprising, and challenges traditional theories on fertility, which analyse fertility from economic and gender perspectives. Social interaction theory holds more promise. However, it is very difficult to find data sources which could elucidate the role of social interaction in the fertility decline. Designing pro-natalistic policies is challenging before there is more detailed evidence and understanding concerning the key drivers of the fertility decline in Finland.

Files

View PDF

References

Bastian, M. & Bras, H. (2016) The Interplay of Family Systems, Social Networks and Fertility in Europe Cohorts Born Between 1920 and 1960. Economic History of Developing Regions 31(1): 136-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2015.1109441

Balbo, N., & Barban, N. (2014). Does Fertility Behavior Spread among Friends? American Sociological Review, 79(3), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531596

Balbo, N, Barban, N & Mills, M. (2013). Friend and peer effects on entry into marriage and parenthood: A multiprocess approach. Working Papers 056, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.

Becker, G. (1993). A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press.

Berg ,V. (2018a). Lapsilukuihanteet, lapsiaikeet ja syyt lastensaannin lykkäämiseen Suomessa 2018. Esitelmä Väestöliiton seminaarissa 16.5.2018. http://vaestoliitto-fi-bin.directo.fi/@Bin/0f4c48d21e34427c712633d715d8226a/1564484263/application/pdf/8380133/VenlaBerg_lapsilukuihanteet_160518_julk.pdf (Accessed July 30, 2019)

Berg, V. (2018b). Suomalaiset haluavat nykyään vähemmän lapsia kuin ennen. https://www.vaestoliitto.fi/tieto_ja_tutkimus/vaestontutkimuslaitos/tietovuodot/touko-2018-tietovuoto/ (Accessed July 30, 2019)

Bernardi, L., & Klärner, A. (2014). Social networks and fertility. Demographic research 30(22), 641-670. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.22

Björnberg, U., & Ottosen, M. (eds.) (2013). Challenges for future family policies in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: SFI - the Danish National Centre for Social Research.

Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility. Population and Development Review 24(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/2807974

Bühler, C. & Fratczak, E. (2004). Social capital and fertility intentions: the case of Poland. MPIDR Working Papers WP-2004-012. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2004-012

Comolli, C. (2017) The fertility response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty. Demographic research 36(51), 1549-1600. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.51

Comolli, C. (2018). Finnish fertility: Pro- or counter-cyclical? Research on Finnish Society 11, 58-64.

Comolli, CL., Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Dommermuth, L., Fallesen, P., Jalovaara, M., Jónsson, A., Kolk M & Lappegård, T. (2019). Beyond the Economic Gaze Childbearing during and after recessions in the Nordic countries. Stockholm: Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2019:16

Duvander, A-Z., Lappegård, T., Andersen, S., Garðarsdóttir, Ó., Neyer, G. & Viklund, I. (2019) Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Demographic Research 40(51): 1501-1528. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.51

Ellingsæter, A-L. & Pedersen, E. (2016). Institutional Trust: Family Policy and Fertility in Norway. Social Politics 23(1): 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv003

Esping-Andersen, G. & Billari, FC. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review 41(1): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x

FIAM (2019): Finnish Internet Audience Measurement. https://fiam.fi/tulokset/ (Accessed July 30, 2019)

Frejka, T., Goldscheider, F. & Lappegård, T. (2018). The Two-Part Gender Revolution, Women's Second Shift and Changing Cohort Fertility. Comparative Population Studies. 43: 99-130

Goldstein, J., Kreyenfeld, M., Jasilioniene, A. & Örsal, D. K. (2013). Fertility reactions to the 'Great Recession' in Europe: Recent evidence from order-specific data. Demographic Research 29(4), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.4

Greenhalgh, S. (1990). Toward a Political Economy of Fertility: Anthropological Contributions. Population and Development Review, 16(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972530

Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J. & Myrskylä, M. (2019). All-time low period fertility in Finland: drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications. MPIDR Working Paper. WP 2019-006. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2019-006

Hiilamo, H. (2017). Fertility Response to Economic Recessions in Finland 1991-2015. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 52(1): 15-28. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.65254

Hintsala, M-A. (2017). Elämää uskonrukouksessa - Eletty usko vanhoillislestadiolaisten ehkäisykeskusteluissa verkossa. Teologinen Aikakauskirja 122 (3), 226-240.

Huinink, J., Kohli, M. & Ehrhardt, J. (2015). Explaining fertility: The potential for integrative approaches. Demographic Research 33(4). 93-112. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.4

Huttunen, K., & Kellokumpu, J. (2016). The Effect of Job Displacement on Couples' Fertility Decisions. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (2), 403-442. https://doi.org/10.1086/683645

Jalovaara, M. & Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review 34(5), 486-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy017

Jalovaara, M., G. Neyer, G. Andersson, J. Dahlberg, L. Dommermuth, P. Fallesen & Lappegård, T.. (2018). Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries. European Journal of Population, 34, 1- 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2

Jalovaara, M. & Fasang A. (2017). From never partnered to serial cohabitors: union trajectories to childlessness. Demographic Research 36(55), 1703-1720. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.55

Kalela, J,. Kiander, J., Kivikuru, U., Loikkanen, H., & Simpura, J. (eds.) (2001). Down from the Heavens, Up from the Ashes. The Finnish Economic Crisis of the 1990s in the Light of Economic and Social Research. VATT Publications 27:6. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.

Kohler, H-P., Billari, F. & Ortega, JA. (2001). Towards a Theory of Lowest-Low Fertility. MPIDR Working Paper, No. WP 2001-032. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2001-032

Lainiala, L., & Berg, V. (2016). Spatial trends of fertility rates in Finland between 1980 and 2014. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 51, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.63337

Lainiala, L., & Miettinen, A. (2014). Skewed Marriage Markets and Sex Ratios of Finnish People in their Twenties. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 48, 51-63

Leridon, H. (2015): The Development of Fertility Theories: A Multidisciplinary Endeavour. Population-E, 70 (2), 2015, 309-348 https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.1502.0331

Lutz, W., Skirbekk V., & Testa, MR. (2005). The low fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography.

McDonald, P. (2015). Societal foundations for explaining low fertility: Gender equity. Demographic Research 28(34). 981-994 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34

Mencarini, L. (2019): Is It All About Happiness? The latest evidence on wellbeing and childbearing decisions in Europe. Population & Policy Compact Policy Brief 22. July 2019. https://www.population-europe.eu/policy-brief/it-all-about-happiness (Accessed August 3, 2019)

Miettinen, A., Basten, S., Rotkirch A (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic research 24(20), 469-496. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20

Miettinen, A., Lainiala, L., & Rotkirch, A. (2015). Women's housework decreases fertility: Evidence from a longitudinal study among Finnish couples. Acta Sociologica, 58(2), 139-154 https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315572028

Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H. P. & Billari. F. C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460, 741-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08230

Mäki, N (2019). Hedelmällisyys Helsingissä ennätysalhaisella tasolla - nuorten ikäryhmien hedelmällisyys pienentynyt voimakkaasti. Kvartti 26.06.2019. https://www.kvartti.fi/fi/artikkelit/hedelmallisyys-helsingissa-ennatysalhaisella-tasolla-nuorten-ikaryhmien-hedelmallisyys?fbclid=IwAR3gN2BSxRd9zf6WQ_lEj8ou6PLxiL3Y_r8maBy0-mfMqHpogOlIMURNLxE

Mäenpää, E., & Jalovaara, M. (2015). Achievement replacing ascription? Changes in homogamy in education and social class origins in Finland. Advances in Life Course Research, 26, 763-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.09.001

Neyer, G. (2003). Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe. Journal of Population and Social Security (Population), 1(Supplement), 43-93. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2003-021

Nyby, J. , Nygård, M. & Blum, S. (2018), Radical Reform Or Piecemeal Adjustments? The Case of Finnish Family Policy Reforms. European Policy Analysis, 4 (2), 190-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1045

Rotkirch, A., Tammisalo, K., Miettinen, A., Berg, V. (2017). Miksi vanhemmuutta lykätään? Nuorten aikuisten näkemyksiä lastensaannista. Perhebarometri. Väestöliitto, Helsinki.

Tanskanen, AJ. (2018): Sosiaalisen median aktiivikäyttö ja syntyvyys. https://ajtanskanen.github.io/syntyvyys_some.html (Accessed July 30, 2019)

Terämä, E. (2010). Regional Demographic Differences: the Effect of Laestadians. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 45, 123-141.

Van Bavel, J. (2012). The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 10: 127-54. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2012s127

Watkins, S. C., & Danzi, A. D. (1995). Women's gossip and social change: Childbirth and Fertility Control among Italian and Jewish Women in the United States, 1920-1940. Gender & Society, 9(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009004005

Details

DOI
Published
February 26, 2020
Issue
Section
Articles
Keywords fertility [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19514], recession [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6176], social interaction [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10590]
How to Cite
Hiilamo, H. (2020). Why fertility has been declining in Finland after the Global Recession? : A theoretical approach . Nordic Yearbook of Population Research, 54, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.85090
License

Copyright (c) 2020 Heikki Hiilamo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Nordic Yearbook of Population Research agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CC0 4.0 Universal (CC BY 4.0)