Being Finnish, Being Muslim
National Identity, Citizenship and Belonging Among Muslim Women in Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.142345Keywords:
citizenship, national identity, boundary-making, Muslims, Islam, FinlandAbstract
This article explores Muslim women’s views of their religious and national identities, citizenship, and belonging in Finland. The primary material consists of 20 semi-structured interviews collected in 2021 and 2022. The interviews convey three different understandings of the relationship between Finnish and Muslim identity: the perception of oneself as a Finnish Muslim; the perception of oneself as a non-Finnish Muslim; and the perception of oneself as a multicultural citizen. Additionally, two notions can be observed regarding Muslim identity: one sees Muslimness as a central and unchanging aspect of one’s core identity; the other views it as a highly fluid and context-dependent group identity. Islamic religiosity does not in itself seem to reduce attachment to Finnish identity. Instead, those distancing themselves from Finnishness often referred to experiences of not having their Finnishness acknowledged by society. Identification with the ummah, the worldwide community of believers, proved to be relatively low or completely rejected.
References
Ahmed, Leila 1992. Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. Yale University Press.
Alba, Richard. 2005. “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280003.
Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Universitetsforlaget.
Beaman, Jean. 2016. “As French as Anyone Else: Islam and the North African Second Generation in France.” The International Migration Review 50 (1): 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12184.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday.
Bhopal, Kalwant, and Ross Deuchar. 2016. Researching Marginalized Groups. Routledge.
Boland, Colleen. 2020. “Hybrid Identity and Practices to Negotiate Belonging: Madrid’s Muslim Youth of Migrant Origin.” Comparative Migration Studies 8 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00185-2.
Branscombe, Nyla R., Michael T. Schmitt, Richard D. Harvey, and Ed Diener. 1999. “Perceiving Pervasive. Discrimination Among African Americans: Implications for Group Identification and Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1): 135–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2021. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
Braun, Virginia, Victoria Clarke, and Nikki Hayfield. 2022. “‘A Starting Point for Your Journey, not a Map’: Nikki Hayfield in Conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about Thematic Analysis”. Qualitative Research in Psychology 19 (2): 424–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765.
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Burr, Vivien. 2004. Social Constructionism. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694992.
Cesari, Jocelyne. 2007. “Muslim Identities in Europe: The Snare of Exceptionalism.” In Islam in Europe: Diversity, Identity and Influence, edited by Aziz Al-Aẓmeh and Effie Fokas. Cambridge University Press.
Cesari, Jocelyne. 2013. Why the West Fears Islam: An Exploration of Muslims in Liberal Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137121202 .
Collet-Sabé, Jordi. 2020. “Religious Discrimination in Young Muslim Assimilation in Spain: Contributions to Portes and Rumbaut’s Segmented Assimilation Theory.” Social Compass 67 (4): 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620948476.
Fekete, Liz. 2006. “Enlightened Fundamentalism? Immigration, Feminism and the Right.” Race and Class 48 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396806069519.
Fleischmann, Fenella, and Karen Phalet. 2016. ”Identity Conflict or Compatibility: A Comparison of Muslim Minorities in Five European Cities.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 447–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12278.
Gergen, Kenneth J. 2001. Social Construction in Context. SAGE.
Hass, Bat sheva, and Hayden Lutek. 2018. “The Dutch inside the ‘Moslima’ and the ‘Moslima’ inside the Dutch: Processing the Religious Experience of Muslim Women in The Netherlands.” Societies 8 (4): e123. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8040123.
Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga, Karmela Liebkind, and Erling Solheim. 2009. ”To Identify or not to Identify? National Disidentification as an Alternative Reaction to Perceived Ethnic Discrimination.” – Applied Psychology 58 (1): 105–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00384.x.
Jenkins, Richard. 2000. “Categorization: Identity, Social Process and pistemology.” Current Sociology 48 (3): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392100048003003.
Jenkins, Richard. 2014. Social Identity. ¬Routledge.
Jensen, Tina Gudrun. 2008. “To Be ‘Danish’, Becoming ‘Muslim’: Contestations of National Identity?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (3): 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701880210.
Karlsen, Saffron, and James Y. Nazroo. 2013. “Influences on Forms of National Identity and Feeling ‘at Home’ among Muslim Groups in Britain, Germany and Spain.” Ethnicities 13 (6): 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812470795.
Kundnani, Arun. 2012. “Multiculturalism and Its Discontents: Left, Right and Liberal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 15 (2): 155–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549411432027.
Kunst, Jonas R., Hajra Tajamal, David L. Sam, and Pål Ulleberg. 2012. ”Coping with Islamophobia: The Effects of Religious Stigma on Muslim Minorities’ Identity Formation.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36 (4): 518–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.014.
Lewis, Bernard. 2010. Faith and Power: Religion and Politics in the Middle East. Oxford University Press.
Martinovic, Borja, and Maykel Verkuyten. 2012. “Host National and Religious Identification among Turkish Muslims in Western Europe: The Role of Ingroup Norms, Perceived Discrimination and Value Incompatibility.” European Journal of Social Psychology 42 (7): 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1900.
Mustafa, Anisa. 2016. “Active Citizenship, Dissent and Civic Consciousness: Young Muslims Redefining Citizenship on Their Own Terms.” Identities 23 (4): 454–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2015.1024127.
Patton, Michael Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage.
Pauha, Teemu. 2015. “Ambassadors of Faith: Young Muslims Negotiating for Agency in the Face of Discursive Government.” Journal of Religion in Europe 8 (1): 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-00801005.
Pauha, Teemu. 2018. “Religious and National Identities Among young Muslims in Finland: A View from the Social Constructionist Social Psychology of Religion.” – PhD diss., University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-4451-5.
Pauha, Teemu, and Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti. 2013. ”‘Don’t ever convert to a Finn’: Young Muslims Writing about Finnishness.” Diaconia: The Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice 4 (2): 172–193. https://doi.org/10.13109/diac.2013.4.1.49.
Pauha, Teemu, and Johanna Konttori, eds. 2022. Suomalaiset muslimit. Gaudeamus.
Pauha, Teemu, and Tuomas Martikainen. 2022. ”Arvio maahanmuuttotaustaisen väestön uskonnollisesta jakaumasta Suomessa vuosina 1990–2019.” Teologinen Aikakauskirja 127 (1), 3–23.
Peucker, Mario. 2018. “On the (In)compatibility of Islamic Religiosity and Citizenship in Western Democracies: The Role of Religion for Muslims’ Civic and Political Engagement.” Politics and Religion 11: 553–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048317000700.
Pew Research Center. 2018. Being Christian in Western Europe. Pew Research Center.
Roald, Anne Sofie. 2001. Women in Islam: The Western Experience. Routledge.
Shazhadi, Ambreen, Hannah Smithson, Richard McHugh, and Shoba Arun. 2018. “‘Society Does Treat Me Differently and That is a Shame’: Understandings and Feelings of Britishness Amongst Visibly Observant Young Muslims.” Journal of Youth Studies 21 (5): 607–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1406070
Statistics Finland. n.d. “Population Structure. Origin and Background Country by Language, Age (1-year) and Sex, 1990–2023.” Accessed February 18, 2025. https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vaerak/statfin_vaerak_pxt_11rs.px/
Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Relations.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Brooks-Cole.
Varjonen, Sirkku, Emma Nortio, Tuuli Anna Mähönen, and Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti. 2017. ”Negotiations of Immigrants’ Cultural Citizenship in Discussions Among Majority Members and Immigrants in Finland.” Qualitative Psychology 5 (1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000074.
Verkuyten, Maykel, and Ali Aslan Yildiz. 2007.” National (Dis)identification and Ethnic and Religious Identity: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (10): 1448–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304276.
Weber, Max. (1922) 1978. “Ethnic Groups.” In Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. University of California Press.
Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. “Elementary Strategies of Ethnic Boundary Making.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (6): 1025–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870801905612.
Zolberg, Aristide R., and Long Litt Woon. 1999. “Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States.” Politics and Society 27 (1): 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saara Aitokari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author's Guarantee
- The Author acknowledges that the Work will be publicly accessible on the Internet and that such access will be free of charge for the readers.
- The Author guarantees that the Work is her/his original work that has not been published before and cannot be construed as copying or plagiarism. Furthermore, the Author confirms that the Work contains no statement that is unlawful, defamatory or abusive or in any way infringes the rights of others.
- The Author confirms that she/he has secured all written permissions needed for the reproduction in the Publication of any material created by a third party.
User Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the Author/s and users are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format,
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially,
- However, the Work must be attributed to the original Author and source of publication.
The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CCO 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)
Author Rights
The Authors maintain the right to:
- copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the Work,
- the right to use the substance of the Work in future own works,
- the right to self-archiving/parallel publishing (publisher's PDF allowed).
Rights of Publisher
- The Publisher reserves the right to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Work suitable for publication in the publication, e.g. style of punctuation, spelling, headings and the like.
- The Publisher will publish the Work if the editorial process is successfully completed and reserves the right not to proceed with publication for whatever reason.
- The publication entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. This agreement will be governed by the laws of Finland.
