Paranormalism, Voting Intention, and Other Conspiracy Mentality Predictors in Sweden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.144628Keywords:
conspiracy theories, conspiracy mentality, the paranormalAbstract
This article explores conspiracy mentality occurrence in Sweden as part of a 2020 survey of paranormal beliefs, practices, and experiences. Using the idea of a shared sociocultural milieu of alternative views and practices of knowledge as a departure point, the relationship between conspiracy mentality and paranormalism, viewed as instances of cultic, rejected, and stigmatized knowledge, is tested through multivariate regression. As part of the regression model, the effects of other social predictors (e.g. gender, income, and cultural values) are also assessed. A nonparametric analysis further explores the relationship between conspiracy mentality and voting intention. The results of multivariate regression show that the dependent variables only predict conspiracy mentality to a limited extent. Predictors that significantly contribute to predicting conspiracy mentality are gender (being male), higher levels of paranormalism, lower income, conservation as opposed to openness-to-change values, and self-transcendence as opposed to self-enhancement values. Meanwhile, the nonparametric test pointed to distinctly higher conspiracy mentality levels among sympathizers with the right-wing populist party the Sweden Democrats and those who favoured political parties not represented in parliament.
References
Abalakina-Paap, Marina, Walter G. Stephan, Traci Craig & Larry W. Gregory
Beliefs in Conspiracies. – Political Psychology 20 (3), 637–47.
Aspernäs, Julia, Arvid Erlandsson & Artur Nilsson
Misperceptions in a Post-truth World: Effects of Subjectivism and Cultural Relativism on Bullshit Receptivity and Conspiracist Ideation. – Journal of Research in Personality 105, e104394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104394
Asprem, Egil & Asbjørn Dyrendal 2015 Conspirituality Reconsidered: How Surprising and How New is the Confluence of Spirituality and Conspiracy Theory? – Journal of Contemporary Religion 30 (3), 367–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2015.1081339
Astapova, Anastasiya, Eirikur Bergmann, Asbjørn Dyrendal, Annika Rabo, Kasper Grotle Rasmussen, Hulda Thórisdóttir & Andreas Önnerfors 2021 Conspiracy Theories and the Nordic Countries. London: Routledge.
Atkinson, Matthew D. & Darin Dewitt 2018 The Politics of Disruption: Social Choice Theory and Conspiracy Theory Politics. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. 122–34. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bader, Christopher D., F. Carson Mencken & Joseph O. Baker 2011 Paranormal America: Ghost Encounters, UFO Sightings, Bigfoot Hunts, and Other Curiosities in Religion and Culture. New York: New York University Press.
Barkun, Michael 2013 A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2016 Conspiracy Theories as Stigmatized Knowledge. – Diogenes 62 (3–4), 114–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192116669288
Barron, David, Kevin Morgan, Tony Towell, Boris Altermeyer & Viren Swami 2014 Associations between Schizotypy and Belief in Conspiracist Ideation. – Personality and Individual Differences 70, 156–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040
Beauchamp, Jeremy D. 2022 Evangelical Identity and QAnon: Why Christians are Finding New Mission Fields in Political Conspiracy. – Journal of Religion and Violence 10 (1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/jrv202271595
Brotherton, Robert, Christopher C. French & Alan D. Pickering 2013 Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. – Frontiers in Psychology 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
Brotherton, Robert & Silan Eser 2015 Bored to Fears: Boredom Proneness, Paranoia, and Conspiracy Theories. – Personality and Individual Differences 80, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.011
Bruder, Martin, Peter Haffke, Nick Neave, Nina Nouripanah & Roland Imhoff 2013 Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. – Frontiers in Psychology 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Butter, Michael & Peter Knight (eds) 2023 Covid Conspiracy Theories in Global Perspective. London: Routledge.
Campbell, Colin 1972 The Cult, Cultic Milieu and Secularization. – A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain 5, 119–36.
Cichocka, Aleksandra, Marta Martchlewska & Agnieszka Golec de Zavala 2016 Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Predict Conspiracy Beliefs? Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. – Social Psychological and Personality Science 7 (2), 157–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
Dagnall, Neil, Kenneth Drinkwater, Andrew Parker, Andrew Denovan & Megan Parton 2015 Conspiracy Theory and Cognitive Style: A Worldview. – Frontiers in Psychology 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206
Darwin, Hanna, Nick Neave & Joni Holmes 2011 Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Role of Paranormal Belief, Paranoid ideation and Schizotypy. – Personality and Individual Differences 50, 1289–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
Dentith M.R.X. 2018 Conspiracy Theories and Philosophy: Bringing the Epistemology of a Freighted Term into the Social Sciences. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 94–110. New York: Oxford University Press.
Douglas, Karen M., Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtr & Annelie J. Harvey 2016 Someone Is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – Thinking & Reasoning 22 (1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
Douglas, Karen M., Robbie M. Sutton & Aleksandra Cichocka 2017 The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. – Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6), 538–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Drochon, Hugo 2018 Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories in Great Britain and Europe? – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 337–46. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ekengren Oscarsson, Henrik & Jesper Strömbäck 2020 Covid 19: Kunskap och konspirationer. SOM-undersökningen om coronaviruset 2020. Gothenburg: Göteborgs universitet.
Ekman, Mattias 2022 The Great Replacement: Strategic Mainstreaming of Far-right Conspiracy Claims. – Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 28 (4), 1127–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221091983
Enders, Adam M. & Steven M. Smallpage 2018 Polls, Plots, and Party Politics: Conspiracy Theories in Contemporary America. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 298–318. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frenken, Marius, Michal Bilewicz & Roland Imhoff 2023 On the Relation Between Religiosity and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories: The Role of Political Orientation. – Political Psychology 44 (1), 139–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12822
Furnham, Adrian & Simmy Grover 2021 Do You Have to Be Mad to Believe in Conspiracy Theories? Personality Disorders and Conspiracy Theories. – International Journal of Social Psychiatry 68 (7), 1454–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640211031614
Goertzel, Ted 1994 Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – Political Psychology 15 (4), 731–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Goode, Erich 2000 Paranormal Beliefs: A Sociological Introduction. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Goreis, Andreas & Martin Voracek 2019 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations with Personality Traits. – Frontiers in Psychology 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Government Offices of Sweden 2022 The Government’s political priorities. 3 November 2022 <https://www.government.se/articles/2022/11/the-governments-political-priorities/>, accessed 28 March 2024.
Harambam, Jaron 2020 Contemporary Conspiracy Culture: Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability. London: Routledge.
Heelas, Paul & Linda Woodhead 2005 The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Malden: Blackwell.
Hornsey, Matthew J., Samuel Pearson, Jemima Kang, Kai Sassenberg, Jolanda Jetten, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Lucia G. Medina, et al. 2022 Multinational Data Show that Conspiracy Beliefs Are Associated with the Perception (and Reality) of Poor National Economic Performance. – European Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2888
Imhoff, Roland & Martin Bruder 2014 Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. – European Journal of Personality 28 (1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
Imhoff, Roland & Pia Lamberty 2018 How Paranoid Are Conspiracy Believers? Toward a More Fine-grained Understanding of the Connect and Disconnect between Paranoia and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – European Journal of Social Psychology 48, 909–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2494
Imhoff, Roland, Lea Dieterle & Pia Lamberty 2021 Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism: Belief in Secret Plots Decreases Normative but Increases Nonnormative Political Engagement. – Social Psychological & Personality Science 12 (1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491
Imhoff, Roland, Felix Zimmer, Olivier Klein, João H. C. António, Maria Babinska, Adrian Bangerter, Michael Bilewicz, et al. 2022 Conspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 Countries. – Nature Human Behaviour 6, 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
Imhoff, Roland, Aleksandra Cichocka, Biljana Gjoneska & Olivier Klein 2024 Not All Conspiracy Theories Are Created Equal. – Zeitschrift für Psychologie 232 (1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000548
Inglehart, Ronald 1977 The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga & Jolanda Jetten
Unpacking the Relationship Between Religiosity and Conspiracy Beliefs in Australia. – British Journal of Social Psychology 58, 938–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12314
Jolley, Daniel & Karen M. Douglas
a The Social Consequences of Conspiracism: Exposure to Conspiracy Theories Decreases Intentions to Engage in Politics and to Reduce One’s Carbon Footprint. – British Journal of Psychology 105, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018 2014b The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions. – PLOS ONE 9 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
Krouwel, Andre, Yordan Kutiyski, Jan-Willem van Prooijen, Johan Martinsson & Elias Markstedt 2017 Does Extreme Political Ideology Predict Conspiracy Beliefs, Economic Evaluations and Political Trust? Evidence From Sweden. – Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5 (2), 435–62. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745
Lantian, Anthony, Dominique Muller, Cécile Nurra & Karen M. Douglas 2016 Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Validation of a French and English Single-Item Scale. – International Review of Social Psychology 29 (1), 1–14. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5334/irsp.8
Lassander, Mika 2014 Post-materialist Religion: Pagan Identities and Value Change in Modern Europe. London: Bloomsbury.
Leman, Patrick J. & Marco Cinnirella 2013 Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and the Need for Cognitive Closure. – Frontiers in Psychology 27 (4). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378
Lindeman, Marjaana & Markku Verkasalo 2005 Measuring Values with the Short Schwartz’s Value Survey. – Journal of Personality Assessment 85 (2), 170–78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
Lobato, Emilio, Jorge Mendoza, Valerie Sims & Matthew Chin
Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance among a University Population. – Applied Cognitive Psychology 28 (5), 617–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
McIntyre, Lee C. 2018 Post-Truth. MIT Press: MIT Press.
Marietta, Morgan & David C. Barker 2018 Conspiratorial Thinking and Dueling Fact Perceptions. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 214–25. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mudde, Cas 2007 Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nera, Kenzo 2024 Analyzing the Causation Between Conspiracy Mentality and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – Zeitschrift für Psychologie 232 (1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000533
Oliver, Eric J. & Thomas J. Wood. 2014 Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. – American Journal of Political Science 58 (4), 952–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Olmsted, Kathryn S. 2018 Conspiracy Theories in U.S. History. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 285–97. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban & Max Roser 2016 Trust. <https://ourworldindata.org/trust//>, accessed 1 April 2024.
Pallant, Julie S. 2011 SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS. Crow’s Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Partridge, Christopher 2004 The Re-enchantment of the West: Volume 1. Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture and Occulture. London: T & T Clark International. 2014 Haunted Culture: The Persistence of Belief in the Paranormal. – Olu Jensen & Sally R. Munt (eds), The Ashgate Research Companion to Paranormal Cultures, 39–49. Ashgate Publishing.
Robertson, David G. 2014 Transformation: Whitley Strieber’s Paranormal Gnosis. – Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 18 (1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2014.18.1.58
Robertson, David G. & Asbjørn Dyrendal
Conspiracy Theories and Religion: Superstition, Seekership, and Salvation. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 411–21. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, David G., Egil Asprem & Asbjørn Dyrendal 2018 Introducing the Field: Conspiracy Theory in, about, and as Religion. – Asbjørn Dyrendal, David G. Robertson, and Egil Asprem (eds), Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion, 1–18. Leiden: Brill.
Rottweiler, Bettinna & Paul Gill 2022 Conspiracy Beliefs and Violent Extremist Intentions: The Contingent Effects of Self-efficacy, Self-control and Law-related Morality. – Terrorism and Political Violence 34 (7), 1485–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1803288
Rousis, Gregory J., Dan Richard & Dong-Yuan Debbie Wang 2022 The Truth is Out There: The Prevalence of Conspiracy Theory Use by Radical Violent Extremist Organizations. – Terrorism and Political Violence 34 (8), 1739–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1835654
SCB 2020 Utrikes födda i Sverige. <https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/manniskorna-i-sverige/utrikes-fodda/>, accessed 2 February 2021.
Schwartz, Shalom 2006 A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. – Comparative Sociology 5 (2–3), 138–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357
Smallpage, Steven M., Hugo Drochon, Joseph E. Uscinski & Casey Klofstad 2020 Who Are the Conspiracy Theorists? Demographics and Conspiracy Theories. – Michael Butter and Peter Knight (eds), Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 263–77. London: Routledge.
Strömbäck, Jesper, Elena Broda, Salma Bouchafra, Sofia Johansson, Gregor Rettenegger & Elina Lindgren 2023 Conspiracy Thinking and the Role of Media Use: Exploring the Antecedents of Conspiratorial Predispositions. – European Journal of Communication 38 (3), 255–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221122951
Strömbäck, Jesper, Elena Broda, Yariv Tsfati, Malgorzata Kossowska & Rens Vliegenthart 2024 Disentangling the Relationship Between Conspiracy Mindset Versus Beliefs in Specific Conspiracy Theories. – Zeitschrift für Psychologie 232 (1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000546
Swami, Viren, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic & Adrian Furnham 2010 Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs. – Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (6), 749–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583 Swami, Viren, Rebecca Coles, Stefan Stieger, Jakob Pietschnig, Adrian Furnham, Sherry Rehim & Martin Voracek 2011 Conspiracist Ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a Monological Belief System and Associations Between Individual Psychological Differences and Real-world and Fictitious Conspiracy Theories. – British Journal of Psychology 102, 443–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
Swami, Viren & Adrian Furnham 2012 Examining Conspiracist Beliefs About the Disappearance of Amelia Earhart. – The Journal of General Psychology 139 (4), 244–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.697932
Swami, Viren, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, Ulrich S. Tran & Adrian Furnham 2014 Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133 (3), 572‒85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 Thomas, Emma F., Lucy Bird, Alexander O’Donnell, Danny Osborne, Eliana Buonaiuto, Lisette Yip, Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Michael Wenzel & Linda Skitka 2024 Do Conspiracy Beliefs Fuel Support for Reactionary Social Movements? Effects of Misbeliefs on Actions to Oppose Lockdown and to “Stop the Steal”. – British Journal of Social Psychology 63 (3), 1297‒17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12727
Thompson, Jay Daniel 2023 Body of Evidence: Conspiracy, Masculinity, and Otherness in ‘QAnon shaman’ Meme Discourses. – Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 37 (5). https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2023.2244203
Tidelius, Cristoffer 2024 Paranormal Sweden? Paranormal Beliefs and Practices in Contemporary Sweden. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Trella, Carolina, Robbie M. Sutton & Karen M. Douglas 2024 Semantic and Causal Relations Between the Conspiracy Mentality and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – Zeitschrift für Psychologie 232 (1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000545
University of Gothenburg. No date The SOM Institute. < https://www.gu.se/en/som-institute />, accessed 20 August 2024.
Uscinski, Joseph E. 2018 Down the Rabbit Hole We Go! – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 1–32. Oxford University Press.
Uscinski, Joseph E. & Joseph M. Parent 2014 American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uscinski, Joseph E., Darin DeWitt & Matthew D. Atkinson 2018 A Web of Conspiracy? Internet and Conspiracy Theory. – Asbjørn Dyrendal, David G. Robertson, and Egil Asprem (eds), Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion, 106–29. Leiden: Brill.
Valaskivi, Katja & David G. Robertson 2022 Introduction: Epistemic Contestations in the Hybrid Media Environment. – Popular Communication 20 (3), 153–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2057998
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem 2016 Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories. – Applied Cognitive Psychology 31, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, Karen M. Douglas & Clara De Inocencio 2017 Connecting the Dots: Illusory Pattern Perception Predicts Belief in Conspiracies and the Supernatural. – European Journal of Social Psychology 48, 320–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2331
Vetenskap och Folkbildning 2021 VoF-undersökningen 2021. Stockholm: Vetenskap och Folkbildning.
Wagner- Egger, Pascal, Sylvain Delouvée, Nicolas Gauvrit & Sebastian Dieguez 2018 Creationism and Conspiracism Share a Common Teleological Bias. – Current Biology 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.072
Ward, Charlotte & David Voas 2011 The Emergence of Conspirituality. – Journal of Contemporary Religion 26 (1), 103–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539846
Webb, James 1974 The Occult Underground. La Salle: Open Court Publishing.
Wikipedia No date Sinking of the MS Estonia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_MS_Estonia/>, accessed 29 March 2024.
Wood, Michael J. & Karen M. Douglas 2018 Conspiracy Theory Psychology: Individual Differences, Worldviews, and States of Mind. – Joseph E. Uscinski (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, 245–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wood, Michael J., Karen M. Douglas & Robbie M. Sutton 2012 Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories. – Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (6), 767–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cristoffer Tidelius

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author's Guarantee
- The Author acknowledges that the Work will be publicly accessible on the Internet and that such access will be free of charge for the readers.
- The Author guarantees that the Work is her/his original work that has not been published before and cannot be construed as copying or plagiarism. Furthermore, the Author confirms that the Work contains no statement that is unlawful, defamatory or abusive or in any way infringes the rights of others.
- The Author confirms that she/he has secured all written permissions needed for the reproduction in the Publication of any material created by a third party.
User Rights
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the Author/s and users are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format,
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially,
- However, the Work must be attributed to the original Author and source of publication.
The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CCO 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)
Author Rights
The Authors maintain the right to:
- copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the Work,
- the right to use the substance of the Work in future own works,
- the right to self-archiving/parallel publishing (publisher's PDF allowed).
Rights of Publisher
- The Publisher reserves the right to make such editorial changes as may be necessary to make the Work suitable for publication in the publication, e.g. style of punctuation, spelling, headings and the like.
- The Publisher will publish the Work if the editorial process is successfully completed and reserves the right not to proceed with publication for whatever reason.
- The publication entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. This agreement will be governed by the laws of Finland.
