Epävarmuudesta arvokkaaseen lopputulokseen - serendipisyys tiedonhankintakäyttäytymisessä

Kirjoittajat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.112440

Avainsanat:

tiedonhankintakäyttäytyminen, tiedonhankinta [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2961], tiedonhaku [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2964], tiedonhakumallit, digitaalinen informaatioympäristö, sattuma [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10280], serendipisyys, luovuus [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8311]

Abstrakti

A serendipitious event in everyday life is common: it means unexpected information that yields some unintended information and potential value later on. Serendipity as a word has been around for hundreds of years. As a studied concept it is rather recent. Serendipity is not just the unexpected information or experience but rather the ability to recognize and do something with it. Serendipitious discovery of information is different from purposive or known item search as it is  more complicated and lasts  much longer. The discovery of information by chance or accident is still looking it’s explicit place in models and frameworks of information behaviour. It is still not clear what constitutes the core of the research area of serendipity in information behaviour.

The qualities of interaction among people, information, and objects differ in physical vs. digital environments. The bisociation, a creative association between different peaces of information may be computer supported.

This article presents an overview of the research study of serendipity in information seeking behaviour. We explore serendipity mainly in the digital information environment. As a setting for our study we use six main drivers of serendipity research relating to digital enviroments presented in McCay-Peet and Toms (2017). The drivers are: 1. Theoretical understanding of the phenomen of serendipity, 2) physical vs digital, 3) information overload, 4) filter bubbles, 5) user experience, and 6) user strategies.

A new refined temporal model of information encountering by Erdelez and Makri (2020) is also presented in this article. The model presents a framework for better understanding of the temporal dimension of the information acqusition. At a macro level the model positions information encountering within contextual factors related for user, information, task and environment related characteristics.

Lähdeviitteet

Agarwal, N. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Information research, 29(3). http://InformationR.net/ir/20-3/pape675.html

Benjamin, W. (2003). The arcades project. Harward University Press.

Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanics (2nd ed). Routledge.

Boden, M. (2012). Creativity, & art. Three roads to surprise. Oxford University Press

Busch, C. (2020). The serendipity mindset. The Art and science of creating good luck. Penguin Random House UK.

Cunha, M. (2010). On serendipity and organizing, European Management Journal, 28(5), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.001

De Bruijn, O., & Spence, R. (2008). A New Framework for Theory-Based Interaction Design Applied to Serendipitous Information Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352782.1352787

Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication, & Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656

Dörk, M. (2011). The information flaneur: A fresh look at information seeking, Teoksessa CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ss. 1215–1224). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979124

Eppler, M., & Mengis, J. (2004). The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974

Erdelez, S. (1995). Information encountering: An exploration beyond information seeking. School of Information Studies - Dissertations. 38. https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd/38

Erdelez, S. (1997). Information Encountering a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery in Information seeking in context. Teoksessa ISIC '96: Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context (ss. 412–421).

Erdelez, S. (2005). Information encountering. It’s more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 25(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.118

Erdelez, S., & Makri, S. (2020). Information encountering re-encountered. A conceptual re-examination of serendipity in the context of information acquisition. Journal of documentation, 76(3), 731-751. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2019-0151

Forsblom, A., Nurmi, P., Åman, P., & Liikkanen, L. (2012). Out of the bubble: serendipitous even recommendations at an urban music festival. Teoksessa Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ‘12’) (ss. 253–256). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2166966.2167011

Heinström, J., & Sormunen, E. (2020). Serendipity as chaos or discovery-exploring the role of personality and sense of coherence. Teoksessa Proceedings of ISIC, the Information Behaviour Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 28-30 September, 2020. Information Research, 25(4), paper isic2001. https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2001

Herakleitos (1971). Yksi ja sama: aforismeja. Otava.

Koestler, A. (1964). The art of creation. Hutchinson.

Makri, S., Chen, Y.-C., McKay, D., Buchanan, G., & Ocepek, M. (2019). Discovering the unfindable: The tension between findability and discoverability in a bookshop designed for serendipity. Teoksessa Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019 17th IFIP TC 13 International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29384-0_1

Makri, S., Raven, M., & McKay, D. (2017). After serendipity strikes: creating value from encountered information. Teoksessa S. Erdelez & N. K. Agarwal (toim.), Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (ss. 279– 288). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401031

Makri, S. (2014). Serendipity is not bullshit. Teoksessa EuroHCIR 2014, The 4th European Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/13508

McCay-Peet,L., & Toms, E., (2017). Researching serendipity in digital information environments. Morgan, & Claypool.

McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and technology, 66(7), 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23273

McCay-Peet, L., Toms, E., & Kelloway, E. (2015). Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment and individual differences. Information Processing, & Management, 51(4), 391-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.004

Napier, N., & Hoang Vuong, Q. (2013). Serendipity as a strategic advantage? Teoksessa T. J. Wilkinson & V. R. Kannon (toim.), Strategic management in the 21st Century (ss. 175-199). ABC-CLIO.

Nwone, S., & Mutula, S. (2020). Active and passive information behavior of the professiorate: A descriptive comparative analysis. South African journal Information management, 22(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v22i1.1161

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble — What the Internet is Hiding From You. Penguin Press.

Savolainen, R. (2018). Berrypicking and information foraging: Comparison of two theoretical frameworks for studying exploratory search. Journal of Information Science, 44(5), 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517713168

Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing: individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Singh, A. (9.5.2014). Serendipity is bullshit. The Stanford Daily. https://www.stanforddaily.com/2014/05/09/serendipity-is-bullshit/

Taleb, N. N. (2013). Musta joutsen: erittäin epätodennäköisen vaikutus (2. laajennettu laitos). Terra Cognita.

Toivanen, M, Känsälä, M., & Kalliomäki-Levanto, T. (2021). Serendipisyyskokemuksia asiantuntijatyössä. Työelämän Tutkimus, 19(3), 373-401. https://doi.org/10.37455/tt.97000

Wilén, R., & Holopainen, M. (2017). ”Älä jätä käyttämättä sattuman tarjoamia mahdollisuuksia”. Serendipisyys tiedonhaun ilmiönä. Informaatiotutkimus, 36(2), 42-70. https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.65195

Zuckerman, E. (2014). Digital Cosmopolitans: Why we think the Internet connects us, Why it doesn’t, and how to rewire it. W.W. Norton.

Tiedostolataukset

Julkaistu

2021-12-21

Viittaaminen

Wilén, R., & Holopainen, M. (2021). Epävarmuudesta arvokkaaseen lopputulokseen - serendipisyys tiedonhankintakäyttäytymisessä. Informaatiotutkimus, 40(4), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.112440