Genealogy, GEDCOM, and popularity implications

Lähdeviitteet

Afuah, A. (2013). Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct: Are network effects really all about size? Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 257--273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2013

Ancestry. (n.d.). https://www.ancestry.com/

Association of Professional Genealogists. (2016). APGQ subject index 1979-2016 (September). https://www.apgen.org/publications/quarterly/archives/1979-2016SeptAPGQindex.pdf

Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information and information systems. Westport (Conn.): Praeger.

Darby, P., & Clough, P. (2013). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of genealogists and family historians. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 73--84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512469765

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319--340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Duff, W., & Johnson, C. (2003). Where is the list with all the names? Information-seeking behavior of genealogists. The American Archivist, 66(1), 79--95. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n

FamilySearch. (n.d.). https://familysearch.org/

Friday, K. (2012). Learning from e-family history: Online research behaviour and strategies of family historians and implications for local studies collections. https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/734

Friday, K. (2014). Learning from e-family history: A model of online family historian research behaviour. Information Research, 19(4). http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-4/paper641.html

Galliers, R. (ed.). (1992). Choosing information systems research approaches. In Information systems research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines (pp. 144--162). Oxford: Blackwell.

Gellatly, C. (2015). Reconstructing historical populations from genealogical data files. In G. Bloothooft, P. Christen, K. Mandemakers, & M. Schraagen (eds.), Population reconstruction (pp. 111--128). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19884-2_6

Genealogica grafica. (n.d.). http://www.genealogicagrafica.nl

Geneanet. (n.d.). http://www.geneanet.org

Genes reunited. (n.d.). http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/

Hyvönen, E. (2018). Semanttinen web : Linkitetyn avoimen datan käsikirja. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232--240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004

Land, F. (1992). The information systems domain. In R. Galliers (ed.), Information systems research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines (pp. 6--13). Oxford: Blackwell.

Mann, A. E. (1999). FamilySearch: What it is and how to use it. Genealogical Computing, 19(1), 8--11.

Mark, G., Lyytinen, K., & Bergman, M. (2007). Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(11). https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss11/34

Mayfield, D. M., & Brown, A. G. (1999). FamilySearch. Genealogical Computing, 10(1), 1, 8--12.

Myllynen, J. (2007). Semanttinen web ja sukututkimus (Master's Thesis). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-2007243

Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612--629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664

Oswick, C., & Robertson, M. (2009). Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 179--193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879137

Schrier, K. (2016). Knowledge games : How playing games can solve problems, create insight, and make change. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129--138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769

Sippu, S. (2000). Tietokoneavusteinen sukututkimus. Genos, 71(3), 127--141. https://www.genealogia.fi/genos-old/71/71_127.htm

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology,``translations'' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387--420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Suku-forum thread on Suomi-tietokanta. (2014). http://suku.genealogia.fi/showthread.php?t=31748

van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695--704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186--204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Yakel, E. (2004). Seeking information, seeking connections, seeking meaning: Genealogists and family historians. Information Research, 10(1). http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper205.html

Yakel, E., & Torres, D. (2007). Genealogists as a "community of records". The American Archivist, 70(1), 93--113. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.ll5414u736440636

Zandhuis, I. (2005). Towards a genealogical ontology for the semantic web. In Humanities, computers and cultural heritage. Proceedings of the XVI international conference of the Association for History and Computing 14-17 September 2005 (pp. 296--300). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. https://www.zandhuis.nl/sw/genealogy/

Julkaistu
2018-10-29
Viittaaminen
Harviainen, J. T., & Björk, B.-C. (2018). Genealogy, GEDCOM, and popularity implications. Informaatiotutkimus, 37(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.76066