Suomalaisten tutkijoiden sosiaalisen median käyttö: sosiaalisen median merkitys työssä, tiedonhankinnassa ja tieteellisen tiedon jakamisessa

Avainsanat: tutkimus [], tutkimustyö [], tutkija, sosiaalinen media [], tiedonhankinta []


The use of social media in scholarly communication has grown in recent years, and consequently, scholars’ uses of social media has gained importance as a research topic.The aim of this article is to shed light on the role of social media in scholars’ work. The research presents findings from a survey (N=528) conducted in Finland in late 2016. There exists no prior research on the role and uses social media among Finnish scholars. This research specifically focuses on the perceived role of social media in information seeking and sharing. We also study the differences between disciplines, age groups, and positions. Results show that scholars do not perceive social media as being central for their or information seeking and sharing, and that social media services are not replacing traditional publishing forums. Scholars do appreciate the social media services intended and developed for academic use, and find them as having value for their work than general social media services. However, according to our results, social media services have a marginal role in scholars’ information seeking and scholars infrequently share their readings in social media platforms. Some disciplinary differences existed, but there was no connection between scholars’ age or position and the role of social media. Our study shows that the role of social media in academic work and scholarly communication is still rather small. Further research is needed to find out what are the reasons for scholars lack of interest towards social media.


Almousa, O. (2011). Users’ classification and usage-pattern identification in academic social networks. Teoksessa 2011 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT) (ss. 1–6). IEEE.
Bohannon, J. (2016). Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science.
Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4).
Greifeneder, E., Pontis, S., Blandford, A., Attalla, H., Neal, D., & Schlebbe, K. (2017). Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 119–136.
Gruzd, A. (2012). Non-academic and academic social networking sites for online scholarly communities. Teoksessa D. R. Neal (toim.), Social Media for Academics: A Practical Guide (ss. 21–37). Chandos.
Gruzd, A., & Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired Academia: Why Social Science Scholars Are Using Social Media. Teoksessa 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (ss. 3332–3341).
Gu, F., & Widén‐Wulff, G. (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 762–776.
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163.
Jeng, W., He, D., & Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 890–904.
Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11).
Katvala, M., & Kortelainen, T. (2012). Huomiodata ja sosiaalisen median välineet tieteellisissä lehdissa. Informaatiotutkimus, 31(3).
Krause, J. (2012). Tracking references with social media tools: organizing what you’ve read or want to read. Teoksessa D. R. Neal (toim.), Social Media for Academics: A Practical Guide (ss. 85–104). Chandos.
Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics, 101(1), 337–356.
McKenzie, P. J. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19–40.
Nicholas, D., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., ... Świgoń, M. (2017). Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 30(1), 19–29.
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., & Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169–183.
Ortega, J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520–536.
Piro, F. N., Aksnes, D.W., & Rørstad, K. (2013). A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 307–320.
Puuska, H.-M., & Miettinen, M. (2008). Julkaisukäytännöt eri tieteenaloilla. opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö.
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062.
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Christian, L., Anderson, R., Ali‐Saleh, S., Nicholas, D., ... Woodward, H. (2017). No scholar is an island: The impact of sharing in the work life of scholars. Learned Publishing, 30(1), 5–17.
Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2013). Social media and scholarly reading. Online Information Review, 37(2), 193–216.
Tenopir, C., Wilson, C. S., Vakkari, P., Talja, S., & King, D. W. (2010). Cross Country Comparison of Scholarly E-Reading Patterns in Australia, Finland, and the United States. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(1), 26–41.
Thelwall, M. (2018). Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1231–1240.
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2014). Social network or Academic Network? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 721–731.
van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature News, 512(7513), 126–129.
Weller, K. (2015). Social Media and Altmetrics: An Overview of Current Alternative Approaches to Measuring Scholarly Impact. Teoksessa I. M. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (toim.), Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations (ss. 261–276). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Late, E., Kumpulainen, S., Talja, S., Christian, L., & Tenopir, C. (2018). Suomalaisten tutkijoiden sosiaalisen median käyttö: sosiaalisen median merkitys työssä, tiedonhankinnassa ja tieteellisen tiedon jakamisessa. Informaatiotutkimus, 37(4).