Informaatiokäytäntöjen tutkimuksen teoreettisia ja metodologisia mahdollisuuksia

toimijaverkkoteoria ja käytäntölähtöinen tutkimusote

Avainsanat: informaatiokäytännöt, informaatiokäyttäytyminen [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24916], toimijaverkkoteoria [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19013], käytäntöteoria, datatiede [http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p29172]

Abstrakti

In this article I ponder how the actor-network theory and the practice-based studies can be applied in information practices research. The history of the actor-network theory goes back to the 1970s and 1980s and is linked to sociology as well as science and technology studies. Actually it was not intended to be so much a theory, but more like a method of combining actors into a wider story without preconceived ideas or laws of thought. In recent years, information practice research has paid more attention to the practice-based studies than to the actor-network theory. The quest for the full recognition of nonhuman factors as a part of information generation and its utilisation can be observed as a common ground with these two approaches. I believe, that if we apply the components of the actor-network theory and practice-based studies, we will get a more holistic view of information practices. These views and results may be used to review information practices and to develop the information processes further.

Lähdeviitteet

Alexander, Patricia & Silvis, Emile (2014). Towards extending actor-network theory with a graphical syntax for information systems research. http://InformationR.net/ir/19-2/paper617.html, 5.11.2019, Information Research, 19(2) 617.

Bates, Marcia (2005). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. New Jersey: Medford.

Brown, John S. & Duguid, Paul (2000). The Social Life of Information. USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Caffo, Brian, Peng, Roger & Leek, Jeffery (2016). Executive Data Science. USA: Leanpub.

Callon, Michel (1986). The Sociology of Actor-Network: The Case of Electric Vehicle. London: Macmillian Press.

Callon, Michel (1992). The Dynamics of Techno-economic Networks. London: Academic Press.

DCC (2019a). About the DCC. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/about-us, 5.11.2019.

DCC (2019b). What is digital curation? http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation, 5.11.2019.

DCC (2019c). DCC Curation lifecycle model. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model, 5.11.2019.

Gad, Christopher & Jensen, Casper Bruun (2010). On the Consequences of Post-ANT. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35:1, 55–80.

Harvey, Ross (2010). Digital Curation a how-to-do-it manual. UK: Facet Publishing.

Harvey, Ross & Oliver, Gillian (2016). Digital Curation. UK: Facet Publishing.

Huuskonen, Saila (2014). Recording and use of information in a client information system in child protection work. Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-9368-3

Lahtinen, Johanna (2016). Tietoasiantuntijoiden roolit ja toiminta koulutuksen ja työelämän kehittämishankkeissa. Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-0140-8

Latour, Bruno & Wooglar, Steve (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Teoksessa Wiebe E. Bijker & John Law (toim.): Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225–258. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Latour, Bruno (1999). For David Bloor... and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s ‘Anti-Latour’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:1, 113–129.

Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Law, John (1999). After ANT: Topology, Naming and Complexity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Lindh, Karolina (2015). Breathing Life into a Standard: The configuration of resuscitation in practices of informing. Lund: Lund University.

Lloyd, Annemaree (2009). Informing practice: Information experiences of Ambulance Officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation, 65(3), 396–419.

Mason, Hilary & Patil, DJ (2015). Data Driven. Creating a Data Culture. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.

Palmroth, Aino (2004). Käännösten kautta kollektiiviin. Tuuliosuuskunnat toimijaverkkoina. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-39-1825-4

Pilerot, Ola (2014). Designing researchers’ information sharing – The enactment of a discipline. Borås: University of Borås.

Plesner, Ursula (2009). An actor-network perspective on changing work practices: Communication technologies as actants in newswork. Journalism 10(5), 604–626.

Poutiainen, Timo (2014). “Kokonaisuutena ei ollut paha harjoitus”, eTampere-kehittämisohjelma verkostojen rakentajana. Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-9410-9

Räsänen, Minna & Nyce, James M. (2013). The Raw is Cooked: Data in Intelligence Practice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 38, 5, 655–677.

Savolainen, Reijo (2007). Information Behavior and Information Practice: Reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of Information-Seeking Studies. The Library Quarterly, vol. 77, 109–132.

Sayes, Edwin (2014). Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, (44)1, 134–149.

Schreiber, Trine (2017). E-learning objects and actor-networks as configuring information literacy teaching. Information Research, 22(1), CoLIS paper 1605. http://InformationR.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1605.html, 5.11.2019, (arkistoitu: WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6oJcW2sRp).

Shove, Elizabeth, Pantzar, Mika & Watson, Matt (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice. UK: Sage.

Sørensen, Esrid (2009). The materiality of learning. Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stantton, Jeffery (2013). An Introduction to Data Science. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6iefdnF22XQeVZDSkxjZ0Z5VUE/edit?pli=1, 5.11.2019.

Tabak, Edin (2015). Information Cosmopolitics: An Actor Network Theory Approach to Information. UK: Chandos Publisihng.

Talja, Sanna (2005). The Domain Analytic Approach to Scholars’ Information Practices. Teoksessa K. Fisher, S. Erdelez, and L. McKechnie (Eds): Theories of information behavior: A researcher's guide, 123–127. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Talja, Sanna & Hansen, Preben (2006). Information Sharing. Teoksessa: New directions in human information behaviour, 113–134. New York: Springer.

Talja, Sanna (2010). Science and Technology Studies. Teoksessa: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd edition) 4604–4612, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Tuominen, Kimmo; Talja, Sanna & Savolainen, Reijo (2005). ”Isms” in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, vol. 61, 79–101.

Venturini, Tommaso (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theories. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.

Wilson, Thomas D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science Research, vol. 3 no.2, 49–55.

Åkerman, Maria (2006). Tiedon tuotannon käytännöt ja ympäristöpoliittinen toimijuus. Rajaamisen ja yhdistämisen politiikkaa. Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:951-44-6576-8

Julkaistu
2019-12-03
Viittaaminen
Louhivuori, J. (2019). Informaatiokäytäntöjen tutkimuksen teoreettisia ja metodologisia mahdollisuuksia: toimijaverkkoteoria ja käytäntölähtöinen tutkimusote. Informaatiotutkimus, 38(3-4). https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.87770
Osasto
Artikkelit