The finite remote past tense in Udmurt
From temporal to modal and pragmatic functions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.113825Abstract
In addition to synthetic past tenses, there are several analytic past tenses in the Udmurt language. The analytic remote past tenses have been scarcely studied and they are inconsistently described in previous studies, grammars and textbooks. The present contribution aims to describe the functions of two finite remote past tenses in Udmurt. The data used in the study are newspaper texts, and the analysis has been conducted with the help of native speakers. I have analyzed two sets of forms: the first representing the finite remote past and the second the finite remote past. The results show that Serebrennikov’s (1960) description of the analytic remote pasts is in many ways accurate, and that contrary to what many newer descriptions suggest, the forms in question do not differ in aspectual notions. The forms have the temporal properties of general remote pasts. Nonetheless, the remote past constructions in Udmurt do not only operate on a temporal level but also bear modal and pragmatic functions. Both forms have a future counterfactual function, which is used to express an unfulfilled action or intention. Both forms may also be pragmatically motivated: the first remote past may be used to mark information as shared knowledge and it may alter the tone of the utterance, whereas the second remote past may imply a combination of evidential, inferential and mirative notions.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 435‒485.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2015. Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239‒277.
Bartens, Raija. 2000. Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 238). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Borik, Olga. 2006. Aspect and reference time (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 13). Oxford: University Press.
Bradley, Jeremy & Klumpp, Gerson & Metslang, Helle. 2022. TAM and evidentials. In Bakró-Nagy, Marianne & Laakso, Johanna & Skribnik, Elena (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 904‒935. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics 17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2010. Typology of tense, aspect, and modality systems. In Song, J. J. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 445‒464. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33‒52.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Edygarova, Svetlana. 2022. Udmurt. In Bakró-Nagy, Marianne & Laakso, Johanna & Skribnik, Elena (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 507‒522. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, Nicholas. 2006. View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions. In Cover, Rebecca T. & Kim, Yuni (eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93‒120. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: an introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goeringer, Keith. 1995. The motivation of pluperfect auxiliary tense in the Primary Chronicle. Russian Linguistics 19(3). 31‒332.
Greed, Teija. 2014. The expression of knowledge in Tatar. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra & Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 69‒88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Honti, László. 2000. Die zusammengesetzten Vergangenheitstempora in den mit Turksprachen kontaktierenden finnisch-ugrischen Sprachen. In Luutonen, Jorma (ed.), Volgan alueen kielikontaktit: Symposiumi Turussa 16.‒18.8.2001 (Turun yliopiston suomalaisen ja yleisen kielititeteen laitoksen julkaisuja 70), 29‒34. Turku: Åbo Akademis Tryckeri.
Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. In Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 231‒270.
Kelʹmakov, Valentin & Hännikäinen, Sara. 2008. Udmurtin kielioppia ja harjoituksia (Hilfsmittel für das Studium der finnisch-ugrischen Sprachen 14). Second edition. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language (Germanic linguistics). London: Routledge.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis on Russian aspect. Language 71(4). 669‒695
Kozmács, István. 2002. Udmurt nyelvkönyv. Szeged: JATE Press.
Kubitsch, Rebeka. 2019. Az evidencialitás és az első személy kapcsolata az udmurt nyelvben. Nyelvtudományi közlemények 115. 85‒108.
Kubitsch, Rebeka. 2020. A létige múlt idejű alakjai mint modális partikulák az udmurt nyelvben. Nyelvtudományi közlemények 116. 97‒137.
Kubitsch, Rebeka. 2021. Past tense forms of the verb ‘be’ in modal constructions in Udmurt. Ежегодник финно-угорских исследований (Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies) 15(4). 599‒618.
Kubitsch, Rebeka. 2022. The semantic profile of the evidential past in Udmurt. In Baranzini, Laura & de Saussure, Louis (eds.), Aspects of tenses, modality and evidentiality, 262‒287. Leiden: Brill.
Laurent, Richard. 1999. Past participles from Latin to Romance (University of California Publications in Linguistics 133). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leinonen, Marja & Vilkuna, Maria. 2000. Past tenses in Permic languages. In Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 495‒514. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect. In Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365‒383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic semantics: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, Peter 1997. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nasibullin = Насибуллин, Р. Ш. 1984. О некоторых аналитических формах глагола в удмуртском языке. Вопросы грамматики удмуртского языка, 38‒44. Ижевск.
Németh, Zoltán. 2019. A functional analysis of the analytic past tenses of the Udmurt language. Ежегодник финно-угорских исследовании (Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies) 13(3). 520‒527.
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patard, Adeline. 2019. To the roots of fake tense and ‘counterfactuality’. In Patard, Adeline & Peltola, Rea & Roussel, Emmanuelle (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on the semantics of grammatical aspect, 176‒212. Leiden: Brill.
Peterson, Tyler. 2010. Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. In Peterson, Tyler & Sauerland, Uli (eds.), Evidence from evidentials (University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics), 129‒159. Vancouver: UBCWPL and PNWLL Press.
Poppe, Nicholas. 1963. Tatar manual (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series 25). The Hague: Mouton & co.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Macmillan company.
Šakirova = Шакирова, Г. Ф. 1953. Особенности говора татар Красно-октябрьского района Горьковской Области. Академику В. А. Гордлэвскому к его 70-летию, 292‒301. Москва: Издательство академии наук СССР.
Serebrennikov = Серебренников, Б. А. 1960. Категории времени и вида в финно-угорскикх языках пермской и волжской групп. Москва: Издательство академии наук СССР.
Serebrennikov = Серебренников, Б. А. 1963. Историческая морфология пермских языков. Москва: Издательство академии наук СССР.
Siegl, Florian. 2004. The 2nd past in the Permic languages. University of Tartu. (Master’s thesis.)
Skribnik, Elena & Kehayov, Petar. 2018. Evidentials in Uralic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 525‒553. Oxford: University Press.
Smith, Carlota. 1997. The parameter of aspect (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Spronck, Stef. 2012. Minds divided: Speaker attitudes in quotatives. In Buchstaller, Isabelle & Van Alphen, Ingrid (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 71‒116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tarakanov = Тараканов, И. В. 2011. Каронкыл. In Тимерханова, Н. Н. (ed.) Удмурт кыллэн вераськонлюкеттодосэз (морфологиез), 138‒254. Ижевск: Удмурт университет Издательтсво.
Teptiuk, Denys. 2019. Quotative indexes in Finno-Ugric (Komi, Udmurt, Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian) (Dissertationes Philologiae Uralicae Universitatis Tartuensis 21). Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
Timberlake, Alan. 2004. A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uusikoski, Risto. 2016. Concepts of tense. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Modern languages, University of Helsinki.)
Van Valin, Robert & LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winkler, Eberhard 2011. Udmurtische grammatik (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 81). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Zaguljaeva = Загуляева, Б. Ш. 1984. Сложные формы давнопрощедшего времени в некоторых удмуртских диалектах. Вопросы грамматики удмуртского языка, 45‒58. Ижевск.
