In Between Research Cultures – The State of Digital Humanities in Finland

Abstrakti

Digital humanities (DH) as a research field has been developing rapidly in Finland during the past few years, mainly due to increased funding and profiling activities. Although these infrastructural developments have created (smaller and larger) centres, hubs and clusters related directly or indirectly to digital humanities, the future of Finnish research in this area depends on how the various scholarly and memory organisations, as well as individual scholars, succeed in joining forces. The overall argument in this paper is that digital humanities needs to establish its identity and to create a new space among research cultures with varying characteristics tackling a multitude of problems, and that this can only be achieved through national collaboration and the joint exploitation of the strengths of existing DH hubs. The article sets out a roadmap to this end, providing a detailed discussion of various developments in digital humanities, and analysing different possibilities in the international context. It is based on a survey conducted in 2016 among Finnish scholars in the fields of humanities and the social sciences, an analysis of existing infrastructures, and interviews with DH scholars involved with international top-level DH centres. The focus in the latter part of the article is on these interviews, and on the lessons learned abroad from which the Finnish DH community could benefit. We conclude with a strong call for collaboration to facilitate the further development of the DH field in Finland in response to international competition.

Lähdeviitteet

Ahnert, R., & Ahnert, S. E. (2015). Protestant letter networks in the reign of Mary I: a quantitative approach. ELH, 82(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2015.0000

Allen, T., Cooney, C., Douard, S., Horton, R., Morissey, R., Olsen, M., … Voyer, R. (2010). Plundering philosophers: identifying sources of the encyclopédie. Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 13(1). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3310410.0013.107

Bassett, C. (2015). Plenty as a response to austerity? Big data expertise, cultures and communities. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577394

Berry, D. M. (2014). Post-digital humanities: computation and cultural critique in the arts and humanities. Educause, 49, 22–26. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/49324

Dallas, C., Chatzidiakou, N., Benardou, A., Bender, M., Berra, A., Clivaz, C., … Zebec, T. (2017). European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities - highlights report. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.260101

de Roure, D. (2014). The future of scholarly communications. Insights, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.171

Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hankamäki, J. (2017). Kun yliopistolla keksittiin digitaalikello – "digitaalisten ihmistieteiden" tarkastelua. Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 35(1). https://journal.fi/tt/article/view/60794

Haverinen, A., & Suominen, J. (2015). Koodaamisen ja kirjoittamisen vuoropuhelu? – mitä on digitaalinen humanistinen tutkimus. Ennen Ja Nyt, (19.2.2015). http://www.ennenjanyt.net/2015/02/koodaamisen-ja-kirjoittamisen-vuoropuhelu-mita-on-digitaalinen-humanistinen-tutkimus/

Hyvönen, E. (2017). Digitaalisten ihmistieteiden keskus HELDIG käynnisti toimintansa. Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 35(2). https://journal.fi/tt/article/view/62348

Jakacki, D., & Faull, K. (2016). Doing DH in the classroom. Transforming the humanities curriculum through digital engagement. In C. Crompton, R. J. Lane, & R. G. Siemens (eds.), Doing digital humanities: Practice, training, research. Taylor & Francis.

Järvinen, A. (ed.). (1999). Johdatus digitaaliseen kulttuuriin. Tampere: Vastapaino.

Lahti, L., Silva, F. da, Laine, M., Lähteenoja, V., & Tolonen, M. (2017). Alchemy & algorithms: perspectives on the philosophy and history of open science. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13593

Leca-Tsiomis, M. (2013). The use and abuse of the digital humanities in the history of ideas: how to study the encyclopédie. History of European Ideas, 39(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2013.774115

Matres, I. (2016). Report on the DARIAH digital practices in the arts and humanities web survey 2016. DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory Working Group (DiMPO). https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/dariah_web_survey_chapter_finland.pdf

Mustajoki, A. (2017). Digitaalisia ihmistieteitä tarvitaan. Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 35(2). https://journal.fi/tt/article/view/62530

Open Science and Research Initiative. (2014/2017). The Handbook of Open Science and Research. Open Science; Research Initiative (ATT). https://avointiede.fi/www-kasikirja

Paju, P. (2016). Raportti digitaalisen historiantutkimuksen kyselyvastauksista. Towards a roadmap for digital history in finland: Mapping the past, present & future. https://digihistfinlandroadmapblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/digitaalinen-historiantutkimus-kyselytuloksia5.pdf

Pawlicka, U. (2017). Data, collaboration, laboratory: bringing concepts from science into humanities practice. English Studies, 98(5), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2017.1332022

Pääkkönen, T., Kervinen, J., Nivala, A., Kettunen, K., & Mäkelä, E. (2016). Exporting Finnish digitized historical newspaper contents for offline use. D-Lib Magazine, 22(7/8). https://doi.org/10.1045/july2016-paakkonen

Puhl, J., Andorfer, P., Höckendorff, M., Schmunk, S., Stiller, J., & Thoden, K. (2015). Diskussion und definition eines research data lifecycle für die digitalen geisteswissenschaften (No. 11) (p. 51). Göttingen: DARIAH-DE. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2015-4-4

Sinnemäki, K., & Tolonen, M. (2015). Digitaaliset ihmistieteet tutkimuskartalle. Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 33(4). https://journal.fi/tt/article/view/51172

Sula, C. A. (2013). Digital humanities and libraries: a conceptual model. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756680

Suominen, J. (2013). Kieltäydyn määrittelemästä digitaalista kulttuuria – eli miten muuttuvalle tutkimuskohteelle ja tieteenalalle luodaan jatkuvuutta. WiderScreen, 15(2-3). http://widerscreen.fi/numerot/2013-2-3/kieltaydyn-maarittelemasta-digitaalista-kulttuuria/

Svensson, P. (2015). The Humanistiscope: exploring the situatedness of humanities infrastructure. In P. Svensson & D. T. Goldberg (eds.), Between humanities and the digital (pp. 337–354). MIT Press.

Tolonen, M., & Lahti, L. (2018). Digitaaliset ihmistieteet (Digital Humanities) ja historiantutkimus. In M. Hannikainen, M. Danielsbacka, & T. Teropa (eds.), Menneisyyden rakentajat: Teoriat historiantutkimuksessa (pp. 235–258). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Julkaistu
2018-06-13
Viittaaminen
Matres, I., Oiva, M., & Tolonen, M. (2018). In Between Research Cultures – The State of Digital Humanities in Finland. Informaatiotutkimus, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.71160
Osasto
Artikkelit