Global health security: conceptual diversity, problematizations and alternative approaches
Käsitteen moninaisuus, kiistanalaisuus ja vaihtoehtoiset lähestymistavat
Keywords:
COVID-19, global health, health security, securitization, World Health OrganizationAbstract
Health and security have been interconnected since international health cooperation's early days. That said, the entanglements between health and security have tightened considerably in the twenty-first century. What’s more, the recent COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the linkages between the two more than ever before. In the discipline of International Relations, GHS has been studied particularly from the perspective of securitization theory, focusing on the securitization of health. On the other hand, framing health as a security issue has also received ample criticism. This article sheds light on the conceptual diversity of GHS and details the problematizations related to it. At the core of the concept and the debates surrounding it are normative questions about whose security and health matter most and what health and security mean more broadly. Why are they sought after and for whom is it possible?
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maisa Borg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kosmopolis on avoin julkaisu, eli kaikki sisältö on saatavilla vapaasti ja maksutta.
Käyttäjät saavat lukea, ladata, kopioida, jakaa, tulostaa, hakea tai linkittää artikkelien kokotekstejä tai käyttää niitä mihin tahansa lailliseen käyttötarkoitukseen ilman kustantajan tai tekijän lupaa. Lehdessä julkaistavien artikkeleiden ja muiden kirjoitusten tekijänoikeudet noudattavat Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International -lisenssiä (CC BY 4.0). Lisenssistä löytyy lisätietoa osoitteesta https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.