Kansanedustajaehdokkaat ja raittiustavoitteet
Abstract
As the 2007 parliamentary elections approached, the organisation Friends of Temperance conducted a survey among the candidates of parties represented in the Parliament. The survey aimed to further the candidates’ awareness of alcohol policy issues and communicate the results to voters. This article deals with the results of the survey in light of the election outcome and reference material available. Overall, the survey results suggest that parliamentary candidates are not fully aware of the key role of the Parliament in decision-making involving alcohol policy, and consequently, in safeguarding the health of Finnish citizens. The survey was answered by 694 parliamentary candidates, which was only 34.6 percent of all candidates. Those who had already served one term or more as a member of parliament were less likely to respond than first-time candidates. There were also differences in the response rates between parties and geographic regions. The low number of respondents limits the reliability of the analysis of the response data. The responses can in part be compared to the responses of a survey among the Finnish population, which brings an interesting additional aspect to the analysis. The parliamentary candidates who answered the survey chose responses favourable to temperance more often than the population at large. The research material did not reveal the reason for the discrepancy between the two groups.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Nikula, J. (2009). Kansanedustajaehdokkaat ja raittiustavoitteet. Politiikka, 51(2), 117–127. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/politiikka/article/view/151626
Copyright (c) Kirjoittajat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.