Suomen kehitysyhteistyöpolitiikan perusteiden muutoksesta
Abstrakti
Finnish development co-operation policy did not start out as a clearly defined whole, with comprehensive and systematic guidelines. Only gradually, as the volume of aid increased and experiences accumulated, did its basic goals and the motives for co-operation take shape. It seems possible to distinguish different periods, when different premisses have been emphasized. The characteristics of the various stages could be described as follows: the infant stage, or instrumentalism; first steps, or enlightened self-interest; growing up, or global responsibility; puberty, or commercialization versus solidarity. — Finland is in a kind of intermediate position within the international community both in terms of North-South relations as well as those between East and West. In the latter sphere, her policy of neutrality has created the basis for a mediatory role in questions like European security and disarmament. Similarly Finland’s overall position on the North-South axis, as one of a number of semi-peripheral countries, provides notable possibilities for political and diplomatic initiatives in discussions concerning global development. In this field Finland has, however, been somewhat passive up to now.Lataukset
Lataustietoja ei ole vielä saatavilla.
Viittaaminen
Kiljunen, K. (1983). Suomen kehitysyhteistyöpolitiikan perusteiden muutoksesta. Politiikka, 25(2), 87–102. Noudettu osoitteesta https://journal.fi/politiikka/article/view/150481
Copyright (c) Kirjoittajat
Tämä työ on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä-EiKaupallinen-EiMuutoksia 4.0 Kansainvälinen Julkinen -lisenssillä.