Domination or possibility?

‘Power’ in ex-parliamentarians’ oral history interviews

Authors

  • Matti Hyvärinen Tampereen yliopisto
  • Pauliina Latvala-Harvilahti Itä-Suomen yliopisto
  • Mykola Andrushchenko Tampereen yliopisto

Keywords:

power, executive power, spielraum, influence, authority

Abstract

Researchers of power have traditionally debated on the definitions of power to enable further empirical studies. This article, instead, asks how political actors – namely veteran MPs in their interviews – themselves speak about “power”, and as which kind of instrument of political action “power” functions. Do veteran MPs perceive power as domination, as the power of command, as an aspect of joint action, or as possibility or creation of political space of action (Spielraum)? The key result is the ambiguity of power: it can be both a tool of resistance and a tool of charac- terizing one’s own action in the parliament. The article combines methods of conceptual history and digital data mining in the qualitative analysis of a considerably big corpus of data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Articles

Published

2021-11-19 — Updated on 2021-11-22

How to Cite

Hyvärinen, M., Latvala-Harvilahti, P., & Andrushchenko, M. (2021). Domination or possibility? ‘Power’ in ex-parliamentarians’ oral history interviews. Politiikka, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.37452/politiikka.98555