Role of benchmark technology in sustainable value analysis An application to Finnish dairy farms

Authors

  • Timo Kuosmanen Economic Research Unit, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Luutnantintie 13, FI-00410 Helsinki, Finland ; Department of Business Technology, Helsinki School of Economics, PO Box 1210, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland
  • Natalia Kuosmanen Economic Research Unit, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Luutnantintie 13, FI-00410 Helsinki, Finland

Keywords:

benchmarking, eco-efficiency, environmental performance, productive efficiency analysis, stochastic frontier estimation, sustainable value analysis, sustainable development

Abstract

Sustainability is a multidimensional concept that entails economic, environmental, and social aspects. The sustainable value (SV) method is one of the most promising attempts to quantify sustainability performance of firms. SV compares performance of a firm to a benchmark, which must be estimated in one way or another. This paper examines alternative parametric and nonparametric methods for estimating the benchmark technology from empirical data. Reviewed methods are applied to an empirical data of 332 Finnish dairy farms. The application reveals four interesting conclusions. First, the greater flexibility of the nonparametric methods is evident from the better empirical fit. Second, negative skewness of the regression residuals of both parametric OLS and nonparametric CNLS speaks against the average-practice benchmark technology in this application. Third, high positive correlations across a wide spectrum of methods suggest that the findings are relatively robust. Forth, the stochastic decomposition of the disturbance term to filter out the noise component from the inefficiency term yields more realistic efficiency estimates and performance targets.;

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Articles

Published

2009-01-03

How to Cite

Kuosmanen, T., & Kuosmanen, N. (2009). Role of benchmark technology in sustainable value analysis An application to Finnish dairy farms. Agricultural and Food Science, 18(3-4), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.5953