Timeliness and traffic intensity in spring fieldwork in Norway

Importance of soil physical properties, persistence of soil degradation, and consequences for cereal yield

Authors

  • Dorothee Kolberg Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
  • Trond Børresen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • Hugh Riley Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research

Keywords:

seedbed preparation, soil cultivation, timing, soil compaction, yield losses

Abstract

Future increase in precipitation in Scandinavia may exacerbate the dilemma of spring fieldwork that farmers have, concerning topsoil compaction versus delayed sowing on autumn ploughed soil. The former may lead to soil physical degradation, while the latter may lead to a shorter growing season, both with consequential loss of cereal yield potential. In order to enable farmers to adapt their spring fieldwork to climate change, research needs to include seedbed preparation at higher soil moisture conditions. A split-plot experiment in southeastern Norway in 2014–2017 explored the effects of timing (early, medium, late) and traffic intensity (zero, one, two or three additional wheelings) of spring fieldwork on soil physics and yield. Early spring fieldwork in the unfavourably wet conditions of 2016 gave rise to larger and stronger aggregates, higher penetration resistance, changed pore characteristics and reduced yields. Increased penetration resistance persisted until autumn. The small effect of traffic intensity was explained by location, soil type and intensity range involved. In this context of spring fieldwork timeliness, the proportion of 2–6 mm aggregates and penetration resistance were the properties most strongly correlated with other soil physical properties and cereal yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Section
Articles

Published

2020-05-14

How to Cite

Kolberg, D., Børresen, T., & Riley, H. (2020). Timeliness and traffic intensity in spring fieldwork in Norway: Importance of soil physical properties, persistence of soil degradation, and consequences for cereal yield. Agricultural and Food Science, 29(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.83441
Received 2019-06-30
Accepted 2020-01-09
Published 2020-05-14