Effects of meat bone meal as fertilizer on yield and quality of sugar beet and carrot

Authors

• Jukka Kivelä Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
• Lin Chen Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
• Susanna Muurinen Sugar Beet Research Centre Finland
• Pirjo Kivijärvi Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
• Veikko Hintikainen Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
• Juha Helenius Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.8587

Keywords:

nitrogen, phosphorus, organic fertilizer, recycling, sugar beet, carrot

Abstract

Meat and bone meal (MBM) is a by-product of the meat industry and is an important pathway for recycling of N and P. MBM contains about 8% N, 5% P, 1% K and 10% Ca. Field trials compared the effects of MBM and mineral  fertilizer on yield and quality of sugar beet (2008-2009) and carrot (2010-2011) in Finland. MBM fertilisation of sugar beet grown on clay loam and sandy clay soil gave 11.4% (2008) and 19.6% (2009) lower yields than mineral fertilizers. The lower root yield in 2008 was compensated by higher extractable sugar content and lower amino-N, K and Na in root but no such compensation in root quality was detected for 2009. Mixing MBM with mineral NPK fertilizers had similar effects as MBM-alone. MBM (80 kg N ha-1 2010 and 60 kg N ha-1 2011) together with K fertilizer (Patentkali®, 180 kg K ha-1) were applied for carrot to a fine sandy till soil in 2010 and sandy loam in 2011. MBM alone gave 14% lower total and marketable root yield than mineral fertilization. The lower yield was compensated by improved quality, lower NO3- content in the carrot and good storability. Adding extra fertilizer during growth or separating fertilization applications had no effect on root yield or quality. MBM performed in these cases mainly as an organic N fertilizer. The N supply from MBM is not sufficient for achieving same yields as with mineral fertilizers. The relative N efficiency of total N of MBM was 83% that of mineral fertilizers. MBM should be targeted on soils with low P status.
We conclude that MBM is a reasonably competitive alternative to mineral fertilizers, and as a recycled fertilizer it is a good option for organic production.